• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    57 minutes ago

    “Technically” bulletproof (in that some parts can’t have holes poked through them by bullets), can’t drive through sand or mud.

    Very apocalypse-proof.

  • Ougie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Aside from the fact that you’d be funding the nazis, it’s so fucking ugly…

        • Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 minutes ago

          Maybe a hot take, but I thought it looked cool in the concept images (though those are obviously unburdened by the constraints of reality). Unfortunately, so much of that sleekness it was originally going for was killed by the time the physical product went into production, and the low build quality is very apparent from pretty much any photos of one you can find.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Obligatory… The Cyber truck is not rated as bullet proof. This footage was most likely produced with cartridges that have just enough gun powder to cycle the gun’s action. Actual bulletproof vehicles are way more expensive.

    • SolOrion@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      This footage was most likely produced with cartridges that have just enough gun powder to cycle the gun’s action.

      Frankly, it’s probably not even that much. They probably used a bolt action and really light powder loads. I’d say maybe it’s a .22 but the dents look big for that.

      Edit: Someone else posted this a JerryRigEverything video- it apparently stops .22 and 9mm. I’m pretty surprised.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Looking it up, the doors are 1.8mm steel. At a 90 degree angle that’s enough to stop underpowered 9mm rounds reliably. It will stop most normal rounds fired at it, and especially start letting a lot through in areas with repeated stress. The second you hot load a round, use a heavy projectile or any kind of round with more potential than standard FMJ it’s all going through.

        And that has to be the right kind of steel too. Which is more expensive. So yeah I’m pretty sure they used underpowered rounds at the very least to create this visual.

    • Master@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Can conform cyber truck is not bulletproof. It didnt stop anything that we shot at. It.

    • Thatuserguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      131
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Even if not, I doubt competitors are “shitting their pants” over this. Can’t say the bulletproofness rating topped the list of features I was looking for in my next car purchase

        • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          46
          ·
          13 hours ago

          More important will be the ability to repair it yourself when things inevitably break. Given that musk is insanely petty and political, you would need to count on whittling Tesla parts from a piece of wood.

          • CMLVI@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Or the fact that Cyber trucks rarely make it more than a few hundred miles (if that) before they shut themselves off. Also, if you are ever in an accident and it loses power, it may very well lock you in the vehicle while it burns you to death.

        • henfredemars@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          13 hours ago

          If I could afford a new car, I’d rather move to a neighborhood where my car doesn’t get shot at.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Places that have metal protecting you (legs), places not bullet proof, head and chest.
        Doesn’t sound that useful. Also the bridge I currently take to go to work as the main bridge is closed for updating for the next few months only supports 3 tons. So a cyber truck couldn’t get to my residence without taking a 7 mile detour each way.

        (Not that I was ever considering one nor could afford one)

        Edit to also add fun fact for those that maybe didn’t understand the size of a .22lr or a .223 listed above. .223 is also known as 5.56 NATO. though they sound similar in size, a .223 round has 10x the energy of a .22 (they are much larger and travel much faster)

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Wait are the windows Bulletproof? Because I don’t think you can do that and still comply with safety regulations.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      I went down a rabbithole recently because I was convinced of the same. Apparently this is the only claim that’s actually true. You can take your pick of videos on youtube. You can find things that will pen it, but not your random 9mm or other handgun.

      Having said that, it makes complete sense to me that the “I must be ready to dispense death at any moment” crowd also thinks they need a vehicle that is prepared to repel other people dispensing death at any moment.

    • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Nobody wants to replicate or compete against the Cybertruck directly, but it is the first production car to implement several key technologies like steer by wire a 48v low voltage system rather than traditional 12v one. Tesla has had a lot longer to develop these than the competition, but ultimately Elon’s stupid design and love affair with Trump mean Tesla won’t succeed commercially from these innovations.

  • yuri@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    13 hours ago

    it’d be a neat idea if cars actually regularly had to interact with projectiles! y’know what cars DO have to interact ALL THE TIME?

    water.

    • BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      In fact, when they do interact with other projectiles, those projectiles are other cars. But I guess no one knew crumple zones could be so complicated.

  • Hayduke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Why the fuck would someone be deluded enough to think this attribute of a vehicle is important enough for any established manufacturer to even give it the courtesy of a thought.

    Adding something nobody asked for, for no reason, that nobody would ever be in a situation to find it useful only underscores just how impulsive and idiotic of a poseur Musk is. Though, I guess if I was some Nazi cunt, I might add “bullet-resistant transportation” to my list of requirements too.

  • Hello_there@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I don’t know how anyone thinks buying a Tesla, and in any way supporting the guy supporting the Nazis in the EU, is acceptable.

    • ditty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      This ☝️. Even buying a BMW, VW, or Porsche (former Nazi conspirators) probably isn’t as bad as buying a Tesla from a current-day Nazi

      • DankOfAmerica@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        This is what I don’t get. BMW, VW, and Porsche are all companies that supported the Nazis. Assuming that 99% of all employees at those companies when they supported the Nazis are no longer working there, what does it matter that they supported the Nazis? BMW, VW, and Porsche aren’t a real person each. There’s no Mr. BMW going into a secret mountain lair snickering while rubbing their hands together. It’s really just a name for an economic system. The people all change like the boards on the ship of Theseus. And it wasn’t BMW’s, VW’s, or Porsche’s fault for not having just ethics. The entire country was taken over by Nazi’s. Surely the people that resisted were removed or punished. Maybe some employees pulled a Schindler and protected people as best they could. Others tried that CIA sabotage manual shit that’s hilarious. Some were all about Nazis. But, none of those people are there anymore in any effectual number. In other words, BMW is just a name as I understand it. Is there something I’m missing? Do we need to rename it to something else so that suddenly the root essence that supported the Nazi’s is removed? While we’re at it, do we need to rename Germany/Deutchland or shame them until they change their name?

        • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I think it should depend on the company at the time of the purchase, but that the company is still responsible for their branding.

          Although, I also think the real answer is that there is no ethical consumption under capitalism and any outrage is being misplaced onto a company instead of the system that caused it.