If this isn’t a targetted advert in my browser, I don’t know what is.

And here’s where you turn it off:

  • gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I am guessing the build in flathub ships with this turned off, I dont even have firefox suggest as a settings area. Nor is it in the build that ships with Fedora

  • Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    If this isn’t a targetted advert in my browser, I don’t know what is.

    Somewhere, a dastardly Mozilla engineer is cursing you out for figuring it out, even though they specifically labeled it ‘Sponsored’ as a double-bluff.

    • dou9m@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It’s crazy that you think this was the engineers’ idea and not someone like the marketing director using their corporate capital to force the dev team to implement it… like pretty much every other company

  • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Thanks for making me aware that there was yet another bullshit “feature” I needed to disable.

    • arak@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yeah, i gave up self managing the adware and went to the Firefox fork, LibreWolf

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    anyone know the about:config value key?

    edit: found it. Set browser.urlbar.suggest.quicksuggest.all to false. For anyone not using user.js, I highly recommend it. It means you only ever have to find these settings once. I keep mine in a git repo so it’s easy to transport between machines.

    • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      They make most of it (a boatload already) from their google deal, how about using it better

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The Google deal is a problematic dependency and a single point of failure. I don’t like putting ads in the browser as an alternative, but I’m unsure what would be a good funding model for the project.

        Mozilla should definitely focus its resources on improving the browser rather than side quests.

        • tempest@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Even more problematic because the LLM are destroying search.

          Wait till people freak the fuck out when it becomes the Gemini bar.

        • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I think they have plenty of resources already, some of their uses are questionable. Mail/VPN (i think they already rolled out their own vpn service for some countries) could be a sidequest not for the sake of a sidequest, doubt it’s gonna match 500M per year though

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Mozilla is simultaneously both a genius Google-sponsored company that you can’t criticize their decisions because you don’t fund them, and a money-starved company that needs to make a profit and you’re a monster for denying them the revenue

        • Vincent@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Mozilla is simultaneously a vassal of Google because it’s 85% funded by its search revenue, and an over-resourced company that is a monster for trying to bring in even more revenue.

        • one_old_coder@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          because you don’t fund them

          Also you cannot fund them. All the money you give goes to Mozilla and its CEO which needs $millions to take those stupid decisions.

        • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Benefits of their Corp/Foundation structure I guess. Though if I was funding them I’d criticize them harder lol

      • ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Diversification is a good thing. If people don’t donate at scale then we have Chrome, and FF so long as Google allows it to exist unless they find other streams.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    And here’s where you turn it off:

    Yeah. That’s why none of us ever see that crap. It’s easy.

  • ryantown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Ah, dang. This is as real bummer. What do we do instead? Are we at the point of paying for this app?

    I’m thinking about Signal too: software isn’t free so where does the spend come from?

    • Clambake0351@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Check the box and forget the feature ever existed until you install the browser again from scratch. It’s been there for 5 years, so it’s not exactly a new or unsolved problem.

        • Clambake0351@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          It comes up every few months because someone forgets they ticked it off 5 years ago when the feature first released and then they reset their browser.

          • ryantown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            It’s not a crowd setting; it’s maintaining a product. We love this one because it matches our goal, but that goal requires our fellow persons’ time.

    • oneser@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I have started regularly donating to foss projects, especially those who are clear on their limits of ai in code. Been donating to signal for years too.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I would pay for Firefox if they kept updates like that off by default. Maybe they could have a screen that shows new options you can turn on which I’d happily ignore most of the time. It obviously takes tons of time to build a web browser so I expect it to get paid for somehow, but yeah, the on-by-default enshittification is no good.

    • moth@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      as someone else suggested, a fork is the best way to go. if you are most concerned about privacy, Liberwolf is the way to go. if you want privacy, but aren’t willing to go as far as Librewolf does, then Waterfox is a solid alternative that provides better privacy than Firefox.