Just a simple question : Which file system do you recommend for Linux? Ext4…?

EDIT : Thanks to everyone who commented, I think I will try btrfs on my root partition and keep ext4 for my home directory 😃

  • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
    54·
    7 months ago

    But you can also just use BTRFS without any fancy setup and not use its features, it will still be faster.

    • Eager Eagle@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      6 months ago

      Btrfs is slower than ext4, xfs, and f2fs in pretty much every metric. Noticeably slower app opening times is the reason I switched to F2FS for good.

      • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
        1·
        6 months ago

        Edit: BTRFS has advantages that likely make it better for me.

        It has compression and allows flexible partition sizes. The compression may explain the speed decreases.

        • Eager Eagle@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          6 months ago

          Compression might be useful in some cases, but the bulk of my data is already compressed or not much compressible (think videos, images, compressed archives, game assets). So the trade off doesn’t make much sense to me.

          • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
            1·
            6 months ago

            That is true, not for Flatpaks but for sure.

            I wonder how much of a pain it would be not having BTRFS subvolumes on atomic Fedora. Will try F2FS in a VM.

      • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
        1·
        6 months ago

        Very interesting. I heard F2FS has no journalling, but afaik Fedora Atomic doesnt rely on it?

        It might be worth looking into, as it beat many tests.