Before you decide to ragepost in the comments about how terrible either of these guys are, please take a moment and look at how happy they are. Wouldn’t this be a nice outcome for a change?

  • cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    I agree, GenAI has gotten pretty good as of late, but 0 artifacts at all is still too far for current tech and I couldn’t find any either

    • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      No, this is very clearly entirely ai generated. Please see my other comment in this comment tree.

    • Dran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Could be generated and then touched up by a human Editor. I suspect that’s going to be the optimal workflow pretty soon

        • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          It could be both. Plenty of AI generated images that get touched up by humans still show artifacts, because the human touching them up doesn’t notice every single one.