• IHeartBadCode@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    122
    ·
    10 days ago

    and take the economy with it…

    Yeah like the last umpteen times this has happened in my lifetime. We live in a society of greed, who knew it would be so unstable?

      • IHeartBadCode@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        See entry level people believe it’s fundamentals. Smarter people understand that it’s reading people and knowing when they’re dumb enough to invest and knowing when to bail before they wise up. So if you think about it in those respects, it is indeed an honest to goodness “real” thing. People are really being ripped off by con-artist.

        But yeah, the days of the 1890s to 1930s of structured investment, measured risk, and mitigation of the unforeseen, those days are dead. There aren’t market fundamentals outside of being able to identify rubes.

          • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            9 days ago

            Recover? No they buy low and double their take (or 100x or whatever the ratio is at this point).

            We’re doing trillionaires now don’t forget. Even though Elon might not be anymore, there will be others unless we get our act together.

      • Atropos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 days ago

        We will follow the billionaires into it economic hell. In solidarity of course.

        Fuck, I wish we had a choice in this.

        • P1nkman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 days ago

          We could always make them feel like life is hell and death would be welcome, especially considering that they’re doing it to us., and they. Do. Not. Care.

          • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            9 days ago

            They can fuck all our pensions up for good and starve us. That’s what it took to start the French Revolution, this time it’s gonna be global though.

      • Racoonwithbenefits@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        10 days ago

        For normal people it will just mean some inflation increase and interest rates increase

        Nothing we havent seen in the past few years

        • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 days ago

          …you don’t remember 2008, do you? Mass layoffs, small businesses closing in droves, difficulty getting loans, new grads unable to get adequate jobs for years (half the millennial cohort is still behind due to it)

    • dan1101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      No our federal government will spend billions to bail out whatever AI companies are favored by trump this week.

  • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Yeah, like we haven’t been through multiple “generational” recessions.

    At this point I feel like I’ve spent more time alive during recessions than not, so what’s one more for the pile - especially if it means getting to watch the AI bros go bankrupt.

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    10 days ago

    It has always been either the economy crashing because the AI bubble pops, or the economy crashes because the bubble didn’t pop due to AI successfully replacing enormous numbers of workers.

    • Thorry@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      10 days ago

      Or the economy crashes by AI replacing everyone and doing an absolute terrible job, causing stuff like supply chain collapse and communication/power outages.

      I have yet to see someone explain how this whole thing actually works out. Just a dozen different scenarios that turn out terrible for almost everyone. The only scenario that works out is if a handful of people like Altman absolutely rule the world, become de facto dictators as they are the ones that control the few AI companies that run everything. And by work out, I mean it works out for that handful of people. For the rest of the world it’s probably just about the worst case scenario. But you just know it’s the scenario scammy Altman is hoping for.

    • evenglow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      10 days ago

      It’s not AI it’s UBI. AI is going to happen. What was important was an orderly transition to UBI.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      It would be so funny that the economy crashes, making poor people poorer and rich people richer!

      Because that is what happened in the past few crashes. So I’m not entirely sure when and where I should start laughing about this

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        in the past the rich got richer because the poor didn’t understand who to blame.

        sentiment towards the wealthy these days is far more volatile than it was in the 1930s.

        • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          And it will just happen again. If you think the poor will rise up or something like that, then I have a bridge to sell you.

          Do not underestimate the US propaganda apparatus

          • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            at this point I couldn’t care less if they do or not. humanity is fucked. we’re in a downward spiral heading for the poop chute.

  • eleitl@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    9 days ago

    Not could. It’s a mathematical certainty that it will. Barring a breakthrough miracle – fat chance.

    • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      It really feels like the options are:

      • Bubble bursts because it requires more money than the entire global economy not too at this point.
      • Total regulatory capture and we just somehow keep it going forever to the detriment and gradual decay of literally everything else.
    • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      An AI breakthrough has nothing to do with LLMs, it’s like saying the auto industry will collapse except if there is an AI breakthrough that saves it.

      • eleitl@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        That’s what a breakthrough means. But obviously all the funding is burned up in more DCs with incremental iteration on the same design. So the bubble has to pop for real innovation. But I think this coming AI winter will be permanent, as things are very visibly falling apart.

        • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Well yeah, but my statement is true anyways IMO. Deep neural networks are unchanged since the eighties I guess, and again IMO it’s not they who need/can have a breakthrough, doubly especially since nobody seems to be working on anything else than “bigger datasets” and profiling and such.

  • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    That’s the point. AI was never meant to succeed. It’s a ransom. They are willing to kill the hostages so to speak.

  • Danitos@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    I think that’s kind of their idea. Be unsustainable and unprofitable, yet push to be on everything so the Goverment will bail them out.

    • eleitl@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 days ago

      The current everything bubble is too big to be bailed out. It will take down with it everything. Including the value of currency.

    • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      I bet they’re just running as fast as they can, not caring about which direction as long as they are “ahead”.

  • melfie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    10 days ago

    I wonder if we will be able to get GPUs and RAM for reasonable prices afterwards.

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      The 2008 bailout happened because it was the banking sector that was exposed. If the consumer banks fail, everybody’s accounts go up in flames.

      Part of getting that bailout was that the banks had to restructure to insulate commercial banking from investment banking. Supposedly the investment arm can now get taken out, and the damage to the commercial arm is limited. I’ll believe that when I see it. The big question at the moment is “how exposed are the banks?”.

      Oracle, Nvidia, Microsoft, OpenAI, Anthropic are all massively exposed. Nvidia and Microsoft might be big enough for a decimated version of themselves to come out the other side. Everyone else is going to the wall. No need to bail them out though. That’s a contained explosion.

      If the bank are making loans of hundreds of billions thinking they’re sure fire money makers, but actually they’re piles of shit, then it’s 2008 again. That’s when we see if they really protected the commercial arms of their banks.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 days ago

        Well, since all new protections from 2008 have already been shredded, what would you think?

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          If that’s true in the US, then god help you. I know they still exist in the UK.

      • dbtng@eviltoast.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        Nuka-cola is hard to come by here tho.
        I’ve wondered … are the bottlecaps radioactive?
        How does that work out when you have a pocketful next to your nuts?

        • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 days ago

          You joke, but you can buy it. Jones Soda makes it. That said, it’s not worth buying except to keep the bottles as collectibles.

          In-game, no they aren’t radioactive. Most of the wasteland somehow isn’t radioactive enough to set off a gieger counter. Yet a lot of the fresh meat and produce are radioactive. Doesn’t make a whole lot of sense to me.

          • mobyduck648@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 days ago

            Not played those games but to be fair in a nuclear wasteland you would expect fresh meat and vegetables to be more radioactive than the general environment. Animals and plants can accumulate radioactive fallout, if it’s diffuse in the soil it can be more concentrated in whatever lives off that soil. Radioactive contamination often consists of caesium-137 which behaves like potassium, and strontium-90 which behaves like calcium, so you’re getting screwed by conventional biochemistry as much as nuclear physics.

            This is a concern in the Chernobyl exclusion zone even now, there’s mushrooms and other forage that must be avoided for this reason.

          • dbtng@eviltoast.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 days ago

            I quit drinking soda years ago as I got older and needed to cut shit that was making me fat.
            I will (like every other year) occasionally have a Mountain Dew or a Sprite.
            Soda is lovely stuff, but its definitely radioactive.