• Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.comBannedBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 months ago

    The USSR was the only country in 1936 to send weapons, planes and tanks to the Republicans in Spanish Civil War who were fighting against fascists supported by Nazi bombings.

    The USSR was the only country who, as an alternative to the Munich Agreements, pushed hard to collectively invade the Nazis, which France and Poland refused.

    The USSR pushed for the entire 30s for a mutual defense alliance with England, Poland and France against Nazism under the Maxim Litvinov doctrine, offering to send up to a million soldiers to France in exchange for a mutual defense pact, which got denied. Only in 1939 after a decade of exhausting every diplomatic alternative, did Maxim Litvinov get replaced by Molotov (from Molotov-Ribbentrop) to try and hold off the Nazis for as long as possible.

    • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      The USSR sent weapons to the Stalinist faction in the Spanish Republic, hoping after the war they would become a puppet state.

      The efforts of the Anarchists during the war (establishing stateless, horizontal power structures) were undermining that effort, thus the Stalinists turned on them (and the anti-stalinist Marxist faction) mid-war, calling them ‘secret fascists’ helping the enemy, and proceeded to round them up for execution.

    • plyth@feddit.orgBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      @PugJesus@piefed.social

      Is the ban necessary? Personally I enjoy the discussions that spring from radically different interpretations of history.

      Subscribers of this sub should have or develop the knowledge to judge these comments accordingly.

      • PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Lies spread by repetition, not the strength of the point. “Radically different interpretations” are fine; disinfo and fascist apologia is not.

        • plyth@feddit.orgBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          I hope I can make two suggestions about the moderation process.

          If you ban a user for disinfo, it would be good if you could ban the specific comment so that the reason is visible in the mod log and the audience can learn what is wrong.

          OP was banned as Tankie, almost permanently. You should add Tankie to the sidebar. Fascists and Tankies are totalitarian but not the same thing.

          • PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Preserving misinformation has no value.

            Red fash are fascists; both the points of Ur-Fascism and that of a palingenetic ultranationalist regime apply to red fash, but I’ll update the rules to make that more explicit.

            • plyth@feddit.orgBanned from community
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Thanks.

              Should you ever write down your thoughts about the topic in a comment, please let me know if you remember.