

AI empowers those who had an idea but didn’t have the resources to build it. Movies, Games, Apps, after the wave of trash the good ideas will remain.


AI empowers those who had an idea but didn’t have the resources to build it. Movies, Games, Apps, after the wave of trash the good ideas will remain.


They didn’t think this through
If he is controlled opposition then they are one step ahead.
precise value predictions
So, your argument is merely that the point he blogs about does not matter?
No
Or do you somehow not want people to discuss it?
No
I wrote that I don’t want to invalidate his points. I think they are valid.
All that our efforts did
That statement is just too strong.
I do not see how that adresses his core argument
It doesn’t, as I wrote in my first sentence. Free software alone is just nice enough that it is more than a little gain.
Not to invalidate his points but:
We won the debate, and gained little for users or developers. All that our efforts did was to make it easier for big corporations build things more cheaply and for billionaires to become trillionaires.
We have free software. We have Linux. We have Graphene OS.
Everybody can build whatever they want. That’s a huge win.
Hollywood star Johnny Depp on Monday lost his libel battle with a British tabloid which labelled him a “wife beater” after a High Court judge ruled that the paper’s allegations were “substantially true”.


I thought Serbia was controlled by Russia and the students were protesting for freedom. What happened?
As do women, they just can’t ever admit it because they would lose emancipation points. Mansplain as much as you can. You will make many females very very happy.


If they would want to avoid blackmailing they would only hire known prostitutes. There would be nothing to reveal anymore.
Meanwhile they can’t be sure that their background checks are deep enough. Any agent that passes can just be good at hiding their prostitute past.


Why?


Then you don’t understand why long term reliable customers are better than intermittent ones…
It’s a numbers game. Are there so many? Why else would a company care?

If processing power makes the difference between winning or losing a war then we can be sure that all available energy sources will be used. We only see the beginning.
Have you tried dog training? Not so much for the dog but for you to learn how to calm your dog down.
Google supposedly pays out 50% of their ad income. Theoretically they would need twice the ads.
Have you tried fantasizing the core of your trauma?
In theory. I doubt that enough people are already here because only few really want the change.
Now for the next step?
Check what people want. If there are huge differences that prevent a common goal, split the group.
Then have a debate on what to do next in each group, vote on it and start.
I would start with some business to make money and to develop a common culture and ethics.
Expand until there are enough people who can live in one place. Then create that place and move there.
Expand further until the knowledge and the location for a city from the future is available.
Then build the city.
lots of volunteers building one person lots of funding
That would indeed be too risky.
funding … You disagreed
It’s not necessary to wait for rich people to fund it or have luck in a lottery
The problem is finding the people. There is no need for further plans because the next steps depend on the people.
The CIA, not navy intelligence?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tor_(network)