• jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    If I was going to make something like this, it would have to incorporate trust chains. I don’t care if some maga-hat says this lady is horrible. I care if my good friend Alex says she’s horrible. One person’s “this person won’t shut up about communism” is a big red flag (no pun intended) but for someone else that’s the dream.

    When you sign up, you’d need to be referred to someone or be a root node. Anyone connected to you can be weighted differently. If some section of the tree is misbehaving, prune it.

    But that’s a lot of work

      • elephantium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        It makes me super uneasy. I can easily see this type of model being expanded and applied to more and more things.

        Call for a refund because something you ordered never showed up? Wrong trust chain, you’re automatically lying, refund denied.

        Report someone for T-boning you? Wrong trust chain, you’re now arrested for hitting them.

        Etc…

          • elephantium@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s less about technology and more about evading accountability, I’d say. This would be a sort of cyberpunk version of “How dare you accuse the baron’s son of tipping your cows?! He’s a fine upstanding young man, so of course these accusations are groundless.”