Lofgren’s bill would impose site-blocking requirements on broadband providers with at least 100,000 subscribers and providers of public domain name resolution services with annual revenue of over $100 million. The bill has exemptions for VPN services and “similar services that encrypt and route user traffic through intermediary servers”; DNS providers that offer service “exclusively through encrypted DNS protocols”; and operators of premises that provide Internet access, like coffee shops, bookstores, airlines, and universities.

Invest in VPN providers.

  • neclimdul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 hours ago

    "Man we really got trounced in that election "

    “Yeah we should really work on our image”

    “Yeah. Oh I know! You know how everyone hated that tik tok ban?”

    “Yeah?”

    “Well what if that, but more!”

    “But people hated the ban…”

    “Oh right, no, the movie industry is paying us to do this.”

    “Oh why didn’t you just say so.”

    • Euphorazine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      On the one hand, more Dems voted no on tiktok ban

      On the other hand, you can bet any bipartisan bill is not in the interest of the American people