I’m not sure if that’s how posting things to the public works. Optics will always be a part of that.
I’m not sure if that’s how posting things to the public works. Optics will always be a part of that.
Brings me back to long roadtrips with my parents
I’m so rizzed up about using slang wrong
I’m curious, doesn’t WhatsApp require a phone number to be attached to an account? As in, I thought activating it doesn’t work on devices without a SIM card?
What is this spaghetti cucumber looking alien snack?!
Do you think the government should enforce some limits on wealth accumulation? Genuine question, because this doesn’t appear on neither the pro nor con lists in that definition and I’d like to hear a take of a self described economic liberal on this
I’m not sure I see the difference between bringing big oil down versus bringing animal based food down. Both are critical pillars of our current societies, changing that takes a lot of work (even if we were to convince everyone that that change needs to be done). My personal decisions don’t really matter as long as everyone else keeps going the way they are.
That being said I basically have a vegan diet and I very rarely use transportation that runs directly on oil. I just don’t think that gives my arguments for societal changes any more weight. These arguments are right in my opinion, independent of whether I already live the change or just argue that the proposed changes would be beneficial.q
Why would BP change if you don’t?
Because BP isn’t a human being it is a legal entity without inherent value other than those that we as a society allow it to have. If society decides BP should stop existing that’s just a logistical effort (replacing energy needs, finding jobs for the workers there etc etc) where as if society decides I should stop existing that’s a crime against humanity. Putting legal entities and humans on the same level here is a false premise in my eyes.
Also: Arguing for removing BP from the world IS showing a willingness to change personally because it means changing a lot of other stuff too that will affect everyones live.
And I think it’s important to change yourself as well, so you can demand it from others.
I’d argue that that only works on small scales. For big changes we need to agree beforehand that we want and will do the change and then do that change together. Demanding someone jump first won’t work here.
I don’t think that being part of the current society and doing what that society pushes people to do is a reason to dismiss criticism of that same society. I can acknowledge that I am flawed, that I am part of the problem, and still argue for change on a societal level. Especially because it is easier to act responsibly when everyone does
It’s really been 10 years? Oh god
There’s a difference between wanting to feel pleasure at the result of killing someone and wanting to feel pleasure over the result of killing them?
I’m not sure what the difference between those two options is. But those aren’t the two options I was talking about. There are people that enjoy the process of killing things. There are people that like to eat dead animals but do not enjoy the process of killing the animal. Those are two different things in my mind.
There is a difference between wanting food you think is delicious and killing something for that reason and taking pleasure in the process of killing something. In one scenario the killing is a necessary evil in the other it’s the whole point of the process.
Aside from that the fact that so many people do pay “hitmen” should tell you that they do not enjoy the killing part, because otherwise they’d do it themselves.
Uhm, what 96% of the population actually kills stuff themselves?
There are dozens of us!
I hope you find the one that will take turns reading!
My opinion as a german probably doesn’t really matter, but this guy as well as Kamala are giving me hope again that the world might not have gone completely mad. Also if this works out for you guys I hope the german party system is paying attention.
Are the leaks perchance closely correlated to locations where oil and gas are being mined?
Yeah 2 is horrible to 100% there is just so much stuff to collect that’s not actually important or even interesting to collect. But it’s a great game if you are able to just not 100% it. It was one of my first action games and its still one of my favourite art styles.
3 is even faster paced with a bigger focus on dodging perfectly. I like this more than the slower more clunky feel of the first title. It also puts a bigger focus on the secondary weapons that you unlock as you go that give you both new abilities for the puzzles as well as fighting. And they change Fury’s hair colour which is nice because there isn’t a lot of change in your visuals when changing armor
Fighting mechanics I’d go 2 > 3 > 1
Puzzles are probably 2=3>1
Didn’t play genesis, I’m not into the isometric cameras.
I’m very excited to see what they’re going to pull out of the hat now
If we want change it can’t be on anyone else’s shoulders.
You are pretty bold for a man with such cuttable arteries