• 0 Posts
  • 29 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 22nd, 2024

help-circle







  • I’m not sure I see the difference between bringing big oil down versus bringing animal based food down. Both are critical pillars of our current societies, changing that takes a lot of work (even if we were to convince everyone that that change needs to be done). My personal decisions don’t really matter as long as everyone else keeps going the way they are.

    That being said I basically have a vegan diet and I very rarely use transportation that runs directly on oil. I just don’t think that gives my arguments for societal changes any more weight. These arguments are right in my opinion, independent of whether I already live the change or just argue that the proposed changes would be beneficial.q


  • Why would BP change if you don’t?

    Because BP isn’t a human being it is a legal entity without inherent value other than those that we as a society allow it to have. If society decides BP should stop existing that’s just a logistical effort (replacing energy needs, finding jobs for the workers there etc etc) where as if society decides I should stop existing that’s a crime against humanity. Putting legal entities and humans on the same level here is a false premise in my eyes.

    Also: Arguing for removing BP from the world IS showing a willingness to change personally because it means changing a lot of other stuff too that will affect everyones live.

    And I think it’s important to change yourself as well, so you can demand it from others.

    I’d argue that that only works on small scales. For big changes we need to agree beforehand that we want and will do the change and then do that change together. Demanding someone jump first won’t work here.




  • killingspark@feddit.orgto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneXkcd Rule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    There’s a difference between wanting to feel pleasure at the result of killing someone and wanting to feel pleasure over the result of killing them?

    I’m not sure what the difference between those two options is. But those aren’t the two options I was talking about. There are people that enjoy the process of killing things. There are people that like to eat dead animals but do not enjoy the process of killing the animal. Those are two different things in my mind.


  • killingspark@feddit.orgto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneXkcd Rule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    There is a difference between wanting food you think is delicious and killing something for that reason and taking pleasure in the process of killing something. In one scenario the killing is a necessary evil in the other it’s the whole point of the process.

    Aside from that the fact that so many people do pay “hitmen” should tell you that they do not enjoy the killing part, because otherwise they’d do it themselves.







  • Yeah 2 is horrible to 100% there is just so much stuff to collect that’s not actually important or even interesting to collect. But it’s a great game if you are able to just not 100% it. It was one of my first action games and its still one of my favourite art styles.

    3 is even faster paced with a bigger focus on dodging perfectly. I like this more than the slower more clunky feel of the first title. It also puts a bigger focus on the secondary weapons that you unlock as you go that give you both new abilities for the puzzles as well as fighting. And they change Fury’s hair colour which is nice because there isn’t a lot of change in your visuals when changing armor

    Fighting mechanics I’d go 2 > 3 > 1
    Puzzles are probably 2=3>1

    Didn’t play genesis, I’m not into the isometric cameras.

    I’m very excited to see what they’re going to pull out of the hat now