Especially now that I’m balding.

No one said they weren’t funding vulnerability research anymore. They just weren’t going to share the information.

My guess would be someone who is lactose intolerant

Good luck, I’ve been trying for 2 months and I was a senior engineer.

They do it with women too

I got you covered

I’d never expect my wife to pay half the rent outside of an extremely narrow set of circumstances.

Because my career has more earning potential than hers, so we split things proportionally.

That’s pretty wild since half of the political spectrum doesn’t even think they’re people.

Mine is always cold, but turns into a fucking nuclear reactor when she falls asleep.

I’d go with, dumber than a thermite firesafe.

Anyone who is savvy enough to install an OS won’t have any issues installing specific programs, especially since most products that people would be using have a direct download for the deb/rpm.

And if you’re not tech savvy enough to install an OS, you’re probably already getting someone who is savvy to do computer work for you.

But, this isn’t the 2000s. Everyone knows the concept of an app store, and most mainstream distros have one featured prominently.

Modern Linux doesn’t have a learning curve for 99% of people. My wife’s 90 year old grandma picked it up with no trouble.

Silicone lube is a requirement.

It’s really not worth the hassle, though. Fool around in the shower then move it to a different surface for sex.

That’s definitely fair

Violence is often the solution, but it shouldn’t be the first solution we try.

It’s stupid to assert that law enforcement should be completely unarmed. There’s absolutely legitimate situations where it’s in the public’s best interest. Now, the situations that do require it aren’t super common, but they exist.

I’ve often wondered about who discovered arcane symbols/rituals.

Like, did some prehistoric guy just sit there drawing in the dirt until something happened?

Blind 70 year olds can still be dangerous. Being blind and old doesn’t prevent that.

They’re not saying that offloading the responsibility to an algorithm is good, they’re saying it’s weird to assume a person is harmless based on nothing but two attributes.

I know for a fact they’ve released “harmless old men,” who basically instantly go out and kill someone.

And cops

Just as an aside, that $20bn figure wouldn’t even come close to ending homelessness in the US. That’s just how much it would cost to house the homeless population, which is a bandaid on the issue.

The US government as a whole needs a major rewrite to actually address the issue. It’s not a situation with a simple solution.