Honestly, just do what you like. You can browse both, too.

Oh, that’s valid, and forks could be called “asexual propagation”

Cherry picking from one trunk to another could be called grafting.

There is already pruning.

If there is no AI used, it could be called GMO.

I’m not sure if there is a tree analogy for merging trunks together, however.

Cause git doesn’t work that way. There is no trunk. It’s all branches.

It just bothers me that “master” branch is a misnomer. It’s a hold over from CVS/SVN where there was actually a central authoritative branch. I’m not necessary saying the other reasons don’t have merit, as well.

The best reason is always in the comments

I feel master as in “master copy” is sort of problematic too. Git has no concept of “master” as a “master copy”. All the clones and forks are the same fidelity as the original. It’s a hold over from source control which did have an authoritative repo like SVN/CVS.

They are actually different. Yes has the accent.

Si = if

Sí = yes

I totally get this. Even hearing the same song a few times makes me not want to hear it again.

Me: Calls the police one time.

Another day police come unannounced and destroy my house.

Me: Complains about it online.

Average Twitter commenter: “Is this you calling the police? Lololololoolol”

That’s fair.

Fair, I’ve used it recently to translate a translations.ts file to Spanish.

But for repetitive code, I feel like it is kind of a slow down sometimes. I should have refactored instead.

I mean… At best it’s a stack overflow/google replacement.

I don’t like Ariana’s music, but I respect her as a person and she’s very talented at what she does. Despite people constantly making fun of her.

I unsubscribed. Wasn’t really even using it.

True, but so was Windows.

I got a temp ban from reddit. Not cool enough, apparently.

Javascript being disruptive technology is… A take for sure.

Phones are some of the best forms of entertainment with the lowest carbon footprint, right?

I don’t think the light “knew” from the beginning. The light started in a state of superposition, right? Both unholy and holy. Once it hits the vampire, only the unholy light is reflected, acting like a sort of filter similar to a polarizing lens.

Well, if we treat incoming light as a quantum superposition:

|light⟩ = α|holy⟩ + β|unholy⟩

…and assume that vampires reflect only unholy light and absorb holy light, then anything directly part of the vampire’s “system” filters light this way.

So I guess the question becomes, “How does the filtering happen?” Is it by physical surface, or is there some kind of quantum holiness field that absorbs holy light nearby?