“I’d like a heterogeneous architecture sbc please”
They have played us for absolute fools.
More moronic arts and craftsy hippie shit giving the left a shit reputation in the UK
Removed by mod
As someone on a diet: fuck OP for posting this
Okay, so some of the advances that chatGPT uses (consumer GPUs for training) are even older? 😁
As far as I can find out, there was only one use of GPUs prior to alexnet for CNN, and it certainty didn’t have the impact alexnet had. Besides, running this stuff on GPUs not CPUs is a relevant technological breakthrough, imagine how slow chayGPT would be running on a CPU. And it’s not at all as obvious as it seems, most weather forecasts still run on CPU clusters despite them being obvious targets for GPUs.
AlexNet is related, it was the first use of consumer gpus to train neutral networks no?
ChatGPT didn’t begin 18 months ago, the research that it originates from has been ongoing for years, how old is alexnet?
Preemptive nuclear strikes on all gpu chip fabs? There’s only like 7 of them
First world graffiti-mask-profile-picture cringe.
If one’s made one’s software well, the easiest UI to make is one that’s easy to use
If I’m buying a bus ticket, i shouldn’t have to troubleshoot imo
Lot’s of software is just shit/hard to use
Capitalism
The thing is that free markets have a fix for CO2 emissions - my (person A’s) climate and my property being affected by person B’s CO2 emissions is not a consensually entered contract, I didn’t agree to this. So allowing people to release CO2 emissions doesn’t follow the two rules of private property + free markets.
But people who gain from CO2 emissions being allowed just have way to much power
The article talks about biofuel, but not gas to liquids (i.e. Fischer–Tropsch).
Both are expensive but very much possible, it’s only the fact that burning fossil fuels is so cheap that prevents them being economically possible.
Doesn’t surprise me at all lol, technology is always broken