War is defined by the instigator. Israel’s attacks are not a war of liberation.
- 1 Post
- 375 Comments
OwOarchist@pawb.socialto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•[US] Should there be an amendment that allows Supreme Court rulings to be overturned?English
31·6 hours agoSupreme Court rulings can already be overturned.
All Congress has to do is make a new law with the opposite effect (assuming that new law is constitutionally valid).
And if the Supreme Court is getting too fucky with what they define as constitutional or not, they can be impeached and removed.
No, not really.
But neither of the wars mentioned in this ‘infographic’ are wars of liberation.
You must be seeing some very different wars than the ones I’ve seen.
In the wars I’ve seen, ‘emperors’ are rarely blown up, but vassals getting blown up is extremely common.
Violence is inherently harmful.
Some people and institutions do deserve to be harmed. Those people and institutions are almost never who actually gets harmed in war. War sucks.
Or, war itself is a tool of oppression.
And you’re going to fix this by having one capitalist country blow people up in another capitalist country?
I ain’t got time for a whole damn audiobook. If you want to make a pro-war argument, make it yourself.
You think Chrome doesn’t?
Yep.
Absolutely everything that has a huge, pervasive ad campaign is some kind of scam or just shitty product. Not a single good, helpful product was ever advertised so heavily.
Imagine thinking it’s bad to be anti-war.
Oh fuck of with “Ukranian imperialism”.
Nah. At this point, Edge is actually a technically superior and slightly more trustworthy browser than Chrome.
Deliberately using Chrome rather than Edge is super braindead.
OwOarchist@pawb.socialto
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Prolific Repacker Of Pirated Games Announces They’re Stepping Back To Focus On Law DegreeEnglish
1·1 day agoDepends on the definition of ‘legal’.
Any sensible legal system would consider piracy a civil matter, not a criminal matter. And I’d only call violations of criminal law truly ‘illegal’.
OwOarchist@pawb.socialto
Technology@lemmy.world•OpenAI CEO Sam Altman holds more than $2 billion in companies that have done business with the company, a court document showed as Altman faces claims of self-dealing from state attorneys general.English
31·2 days agoEven if proven and convicted, none of these rich fucks will ever see any consequences beyond a slap on the wrist fine – almost certainly a fine much smaller than the profits they made through this fraud. And then, just out of spite, they’ll appeal it in a higher court and get the fine reduced or tossed out entirely.
OwOarchist@pawb.socialto
Technology@lemmy.world•OpenAI CEO Sam Altman holds more than $2 billion in companies that have done business with the company, a court document showed as Altman faces claims of self-dealing from state attorneys general.English
141·2 days agoOnly two industries left in America: gambling and fraud. And AI is definitely in the ‘fraud’ category.
And what do the disabled people do when the only way to get anywhere is to trudge through the snow?
I used to daily one, sure.
It’s a usable daily, not sure I’d call it a good one. It’s still highly compromised, poorly insulated, loud, prone to roof leaks, etc.
There are still pressing environmental reasons to shame people for driving very inefficient cars when they don’t need one.





Every goddamn war ever.