They are way cheaper than fairphones where I live.
They are way cheaper than fairphones where I live.
I dont know. Its not that I dislike pixels, I just liked the concept of Fairphones. And I just never thought about google phones because I thought google and privacy don’t match, even if I have a different OS installed.
I do consider the missing headphone jack a problem, but are other brands better? I did not research any of this, but don‘t other brands do the same. Considering this, I think Fairphone is one of the better phone producers. Im not saying they are the best or that they do nothing wrong. And please correct me if I’m wrong, I think the high prices come from the higher loans and better quality materials than other brands.
What about de-googled android? Is that private/secure?
Can you explain that? Why is Fairphone problematic?
TL;DR: They can‘t. Apps are not encrypted and could be read by anyone that has access to the application files
But it is not as easy as it sounds:
There is a saying „Everything is open source if you can read assembly.“ And this is true (for most cases)
They cant encrypt their code because you phone has to be able to read it, and therefore you could.
But the applications are compiled, meaning a application called the compiler turns the readable code in form of text to binary, which can be read and executed by a computer. Reading binary is (almost) impossible for a human, but there are applications called decompilers which turn binary back to code, but most of the time to assembly which is hard (but not impossible) to read. You could post this online, but very few people would be able to understand this. Turning it back into normal code would require way too much effort.
But there are other problems with reading source code (specifically for ios):
For me the fediverse and Librewolf on Linux