• 0 Posts
  • 16 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: January 8th, 2024

help-circle
  • Incredibly well said. And couldn’t agree more!

    Especially after working as a game dev for Apple Arcade. We spent months proving to them their saving architecture was faulty and would lead to people losing their save file for each Apple Arcade game they play.

    We were ignored, and then told it was a dev problem.

    Cut to the launch of Arcade: every single game has several 1 star reviews about players losing their save files.

    This cannot be fixed by devs as it’s an Apple problem, so devs have to figure out novel ways to prevent the issue from happening using their own time and resources.

    1.5 years later, Apple finishes restructuring the entire backend of Arcade, fixing the problem. They tell all their devs to reimplement the saving architecture of their games to be compliant with Apples new backend or get booted from Arcade. This costs devs months of time to complete for literally zero return (Apple Arcade deals are upfront - little to no revenue is seen after launch).

    Apple used their trillions of dollars to ignore a massive backend issue that affected every player and developer on Apple Arcade. They then forced every dev to make an update to their game at their own expense just to keep it listed on Arcade. All while directing user frustration over the issue towards developers instead of taking accountability for launching a faulty product.

    Literally, these companies are run by sociopaths that have egos bigger than their paychecks. Issues like this are ignored as it’s easier to place the blame on someone down the line. People like your manager end up getting promoted to the top of an office heirachy of bullshit, and everything the company makes just gets worse until whatever corpse is left is sold for parts to whatever bigger dumb company hasn’t collapsed yet.

    It’s really painful to watch, and even more painful to work with these idiots.




  • Let me start by saying: Fuck Trump.

    But it would be nice to have a single policy from Democrats that is forward thinking enough to make it unalterable in the near future.

    Republicans, for decades, have been dismantling every progressive policy put forth by the DNC at a rate much faster than they can create them. This has now gotten so bad that it includes undoing law settled decades ago like Roe vs Wade.

    ALL of this damage could have been avoided if Democrats put ANY effort into making their policies permanant instead of easily altered in the near future.

    They had the chance to codify Roe. And now it’s gone, and likely never coming back. They had the chance for the universal health option in ACA. And because of a single complaint from Lieberman, it’s now gone and never coming back.

    Bidens Inflation reduction act is now no different.

    I find it incredibly frustrating to hear you say “this policy would have remained in effect no matter what happened to him if Congress and a future President left it alone” when there is decades of evidence to suggest that it would not be left alone.

    Democrats have had their policies easily removed for going on 20 years simply because they continually lack the foresight and humility to consider their efforts can be so easily undone by a loud idiot with access to social media.

    They learned nothing from Bush W. And doubled down on it not happening with Trump.

    It has been decades of blatant negligence on their part to create policies with any foresight built into them.

    The GOP is about to ban AI legislation for 10 years, so it is unquestionably feasible for the DNC to do the same.

    Joe Bidens legacy is much more likely to be related to this lack of foresight as it clearly effected the very election itself (no primaries) in addition to his policies.


  • No offense, but have you considered that Democrats aren’t left?

    Because compared to the rest of the world and political spectrum, they are not “left.”

    So you are absolutley correct that:

    we’re exactly the same. Both sides believe they are critical thinkers.

    Both the GOP and DEMS have the same corporate blindspots. Both think they’re critical thinkers, but will defend their party as the “correct” one rather than admit that the system has completely failed to keep money away from influencing every outcome.

    We have a congress and senate stacked with millionaires doing the bidding of the billionaires that pay for their campaigns instead of the people that vote for them.

    The only difference between the GOP and the DNC, is that the DNC wants a slow decent into a corporate dystopia instead of a fast one that kills people unnecessarily.

    Actual “left” policies requires the following discourse that is impossible for the DNC to have honestly:

    • reducing the military budget
    • reducing corporate welfare
    • workers rights & Union rights
    • increasing taxes on the wealthy

    All of these things have become “too socialist” for a DEM to even bring up, and you’ll justify that as them “aiming for moderates” instead of thinking critically about how every facet of our society is now corporate controlled and the reason actual “left” socialist policy isn’t talked about is simply because Facebook, Google, and X own the spaces those conversations happen. Instead of actual discourse, and cooperating on collective measures, corporations make sure the algorithms they control make America too afraid and angry of overexagerated BS to not think critically about the failure of their society to move forward in two decades despite the massive wealth concentrating at the top of it.

    DEMS love having a bad guy to point to. So do the GOP. Yet that finger is always pointed at the other party instead of the Billionaires that have used their unspent “Trickle Down” Reagonomic tax breaks to make society worse instead of better, because problems like unaffordable Healthcare are incredibly more profitable than a publically funded one.

    Yet I’ll bet you want to blame the GOP for that too. Not Senator Lieberman, an Independent, who got rid of the public option in Obamacare by simply threatening a filibuster that the Dems immediately capitulated to despite already having enough votes without him.

    If you want to think critically, you’re going to have to start by not pointing fingers at the GOP when the DEMS consistently capitulate on our most beneficial legislation to favor their coporate donors.

    Actual critical thinking is almost impossible in America, as it requires accepting that the system we live in doesn’t work, and insisting on using it the way we’re “supposed to” has lead to massive wealth disparity and the loss of freedoms to corporate interests.

    It’s certainly not hard to see when the greatest threat to United Health and costly health insurance in the last 15 years has come from an assassin instead of our elected officials. Show me a DEM explaining Luigi Mangionis actions instead of chastising him for it.



  • EightBitBlood@lemmy.worldtoMemes@sopuli.xyzWeapons trafficking
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 months ago

    Real answer: insurance salesman in the 90’s.

    This was a slightly exagerated, but rather typical upper-upper-middle class house.

    A friend of a friend’s dad had the same job, and a similar sized house. Guy had his own pinball room.

    He also had a daughter that was in a secret relationship with my girlfriend (that they thought I didn’t know about.)

    Scissor-box it out with your “friend” all you want, free pinball is free pinball.


  • Reddit had an AMA with a Bank Robber ten years ago that they’ve since deleted for corpo purity reasons 😂

    Here’s the big points from it:

    • Banks don’t care about losing amounts under 5k.
    • Security won’t stop you if you don’t have a visible weapon.
    • Worst they do is lock the door, so bring a hammer.
    • the goal is to get in, and get the teller to give you a couple grand asap, then leave under 10 minutes.
    • Guy did this to at least 5 different banks (all different companies) in one day, once a month, for several months.

    He eventually got caught because of the money he had, not because his face was on every security camera.

    He recommends not doing this, as do I, as it’s just not worth it.

    But just in case you wanted to know how it was done a decade ago, fuck Reddit, here’s the details they recently deleted.


  • You are 💯 correct, and impressive you know the details!

    The funniest part about it all to me is that AT&T bought Warner / HBO in 2014 - 2017 for 80+ billion at the height of Game of Thrones popularity (after winning an antitrust lawsuit against the merger).

    Then season 8 happened, and in 2018 AT&T immediately sold Warner / HBO to Discovery where they merged into the David Zadislav Hollywood cluster fuck they’ve become.

    The branding then unbranding of HBO to MAX was after the Warner Discorvery merger. They just have no idea what to do with their IP as they have no experience making or working in the creative industry.


  • I mean. Not many. At least in the entertainment industry. This fuck gets 250 mil a year, and pulls movies from distribution to save 40 mil instead of take a pay cut. He’s single handedly fucked Hollywood into the ground so hard, that large American studios are likely never going to recover.

    Warner Brothers has already been fed into the wood chipper for parts, and not much is left. They literally sold the rights to their own theme music (As time goes by 1962) in an accidental bulk sale of their own properties. This idiot sold so much of what made Warner Bros, he now has the company paying someone else to use their own jingle.

    That GQ article didn’t go hard enough, and was pulled because billionaires have thin skin from the complete lack of skills their money has insulated them from developing.


  • I find it absolutley bizarre that crypto is viewed this way on Lemmy. Because if anyone wants to know the problem crypto is trying to solve, you can read the original anonymous white paper written for Bitcoin where it was clearly stated its creation was for an alternative to fiat currency.

    So if you hate the way capitalism has fucked the world by making everything’s value tied to the US Dollar, Crypto is the solution to that.

    No need for: banks, the fed, or any government or private institution to regulate currency and manipulate its flow towards corruption if all those institutions are decentralized and accounted for digitally.

    That’s what Crypto does.

    You have a wallet instead of a bank account (modern ones even have savings and loan features). You have a block chain regulating the currency through diminishing returns instead of the Fed. And you have an uncorruptable fully transparent leger with where transactions are going instead of random bank fees going towards bloated executive salaries.

    Is some Crypto a scam? Sure. But there’s scams in literally every new technology where there’s a gap between ignorance and experience.

    So don’t let yourself become ignorant about crypto simply because the counter propaganda is strong and made you scared to try using it yourself. I’m not talking about daytrading, or making a quick buck. I’m talking about using it as intended to buy goods and services.

    Because not only is it easier to use than money, it’s more lucrative and rewarding, and the sooner you start using it, the more likely the value of your assets will increase. It doesn’t take long using crypto before you’ll see the problems with existing paper currency and the bullshit system it’s designed to perpetuate.

    By that I mean - for example:

    Take whatevers in your bank account, and look at what was in it 10 years ago. Let’s say $10. Chances are you still have about $10 in your account now, so for arguments sake, let’s say theres been $10 sitting in your account doing nothing for 10 years.

    In US currency, due to inflation, the $10 in your account after 10 years is now worth $7.

    If you had a Bitcoin wallet, that $10 would now be worth $1000.

    If you want to know why the 1% have so much power, it’s because they control the fiat capital in a capitalist system.

    Crypto is an alternative to that fiat, and one that endangers the existing system. If people used it more than $Dollars, capitalists literally would no longer have power as the system they use to maintain their control (banks, corrupts government, money laundering) is no longer being used.

    Crypto provides a solution to the corruptable fiat in a capitalist system through removing the existing mechanisms of corruption that have been created and replacing them with a decentralized fully transparent digital alternative.

    The people who created Bitcoin did so to fight the same people and systems everyone here seems to hate.

    So I find it fascinating that the firehose of propaganda about crypto is still readily seen here.

    Is Crypto bad? Sure. Nothings perfect. But at this very moment - it’s a much better store of value than the dollar, especially in uncertain times, yet people are convinced it’s a scam.

    When unquestionably the best thing for people to do right now is to get away from the tanking dollar. Inflation is guaranteed simply because Trumps policies have dramatically reduced the amount of Treasury Bills the world is now buying from the US. Those TBills are the US debt, and as a deficit spending country, the US economy only works if that debt is purchased.

    It ain’t being purchased.

    So if you want to know why there’s a firehose of propaganda about crypto right now - it’s because those with $Dollars want you to also have Dollars, so when they diversify into scam coins, they profit and you’re left holding their losses.

    Crypto is unquestionably the best currently available solution to fixing the damage capitalism has caused, and those already using it know and feel this. They just have an impossible time convincing anyone else otherwise.


  • EightBitBlood@lemmy.worldtoComic Strips@lemmy.worldISO 8601
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    3 months ago

    2013-02-27 is also unambiguous.

    Hey what’s today’s date?

    It’s 2025 -

    No like the DAY?

    Yeah, it’s 2025, 02 -

    Not the month, the day - What’s today’s actual date?

    Like I was saying, if you’d let me finish, “2025 - 02 - 27”

    I’m mostly joking, but when it comes to info about dates, I think the most evctive format it one that organizes the information within a heirachy that provides follow up answers.

    Formatting dates as day / month / year does just that. Provides the day it is, followed by the month and year as that is the order that information is usually needed in.

    I find providing the year first (or month) is much more ambiguous as neither are the day the actual date falls on.