Karma is just debt for morality.
- 0 Posts
- 24 Comments
I think the problem is inflation and stagnant wages. When you get paid a living wage, but a teacher is making peanuts, it feels wrong.
It’s not that you are getting paid too much. It’s that most people are being paid too little.
But second girl only ever sees how first girl acts when she is around (regardless of who else is there). That’s how perception works. She can’t see how first girl acts when she’s not there, because she wouldn’t be there to see it.
Say what you will about the game, but IRL does a decent job of switching up the meta on a regular basis. Though it’s pretty frustrating when you figure out a decent strat, and then next season it’s useless.
ApostleO@startrek.websiteto Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.net•2023 Was One Of The Coldest Years Of The Rest Of Your Life6·2 years agoPretty sure they are referring to average annual temperature. The winters may get colder in some areas, but the summers are getting hotter everywhere, and to a bigger degree. So the average temperature will continue to trend up.
ApostleO@startrek.websiteto Fediverse@lemmy.world•queer.af, a Mastodon instance, has been killed by the TalibanEnglish37·2 years agoThey almost certainly picked it just for the joke.
queer.af = Queer AF = Queer as fuck!
It’s like how popular the TLD of Guernsey (.gg) is with gaming websites.
I wouldn’t be surprised if they didn’t even realize what country code the TLD was when they registered it.
I mean, they are smiling in the last panel.
The wizard died doing what he loved…
Being covered in piss.
ApostleO@startrek.websiteto Star Trek@startrek.website•James McKinnon confirms creative differences likely a factor in Kelvin 4 failure to start production in 2022English7·2 years agoYeah, as much as I actually loved those movies (they were the gateway drug that got me back into Star Trek after only watching random episodes on syndication), I think their window of relevance has passed. Making another one would be pointless, unless maybe if it was some crossover with Strange New Worlds. But I imagine that would confuse general audiences horribly.
ApostleO@startrek.websiteto Star Trek@startrek.website•Episode Discussion | Star Trek: Lower Decks | 4x10 "Old Friends, New Planets"English6·2 years agoYeah, in-universe, Starfleet seems to have a real nepotism problem.
ApostleO@startrek.websiteto Star Trek@startrek.website•Episode Discussion | Star Trek: Lower Decks | 4x10 "Old Friends, New Planets"English17·2 years agoI asked the same question out loud to myself when I saw Boims in the captain seat. Best guess: since the plan was just to tow the destroyer and throw it, they knew he wouldn’t have to do much, and it’d give him a shot. Plus they might have taken his relationship with Mariner (and his rapport with the rest of the Lower Decks gang) into account. Lastly, it might have been a tactic for if the admiralty went through with court-martials. Whomever answered that hail in the captain’s seat would be in more hot water than the rest of the crew.
ApostleO@startrek.websiteto Comic Strips@lemmy.world•"Autocomplete" by Zach Weinersmith11·2 years agoYo mama so large, she’s a “plus-sized” language model.
ApostleO@startrek.websiteto Star Trek@startrek.website•Aw sweet! The Cerritos made it into the ships of the line!English3·2 years agoBorg Sphere - best ship.
ApostleO@startrek.websiteto Star Trek@startrek.website•Episode Discussion | Star Trek: Lower Decks | 4x07 "A Few Badgeys More"English4·2 years agoNow we know why he was so popular on the raisin farm.
ApostleO@startrek.websiteto Star Trek@startrek.website•What would you rate Discovery from 1 to 10 and why (please explain your score)? 1 being the worst score and 10 being the best scoreEnglish1·2 years agoThat’s for the critique.
You’re right that I couldn’t think of any explicit retcons. The closest I could think of, other than technology, were Burnham being related to Spock (which you touched on), and how absolutely decimated the Federation was by the Klingons while Discovery was in the mirror universe (again, not necessarily a retcon, but it seems like it would have been mentioned more).
Regarding tech, I had legitimately forgotten that Burnham’s parents and the time suit were Section 31. That said, what other amazing tech do we ever see out of Section 31? Granted, we don’t even see much of Section 31 in other shows, outside of DS9 and ENT, but in those cases, I seem to recall them being more intelligence operatives. They accomplish their job by knowing more than others, and operating outside usual Federation conventions. It’s spy stuff, not super weapons (outside the Changeling virus). But maybe I’m forgetting things.
ApostleO@startrek.websiteto Star Trek@startrek.website•Was WW3 the same as the Eugenics wars or were those 2 separate ones? Also, does anyone have the chronology of all wars that have happened in Star Trek?English16·2 years agoI, for one, am tired of living in interesting times.
ApostleO@startrek.websiteto Star Trek@startrek.website•What would you rate Discovery from 1 to 10 and why (please explain your score)? 1 being the worst score and 10 being the best scoreEnglish221·2 years agoOverall, I thought it was fine. I think it got hit a little harshly by critics. It’s not terrible (read: unwatchable), but it’s pretty firmly my least favorite Star Trek series.
Without actually looking through the full episode lists, and just going off what I remember of each season, here are my gut ratings:
S1: 3/10
S2: 5/10
S3: 4/10
S4: 8/10
Overall: 5/10
Going a bit more into my thoughts in each…
Season 1 - 3/10
Pros:
- First new Trek in a while.
- Neat graphics.
- Great cast. (Especially Doug Jones as Saru).
Cons:
- Prequel-itis…
- New graphics don’t match the TOS era.
- We already know, roughly, how things will pan out.
- Retcons.
- Unintelligible Klingons (and unreadable subtitles).
- Discovery is ugly.
Season 2 - 5/10
Pros:
- Interesting season-long mystery, with payoff for multiple story beats.
- Introduces Anson Mount as Captain Pike, leading to the spinoff of Strange New Worlds.
Cons:
- More prequel-itis…
- Puts legacy characters in peril, when the audience knows they canonically must survive. Saps any tension.
- Galaxy-level threat must obviously be defeated, since we know there’s life in the future canon.
- Burnham time suit well beyond reasonable tech level for the era.
- Control drone fleet tech unreasonable for the era.
- Predestination/Bootstrap paradox.
- Discount Borg.
Season 3 - 4/10
Pros:
- Finally out of prequel territory.
- Cool future tech.
- Interesting mystery of The Burn.
- Great character development.
Cons:
- Unsatisfying conclusion to The Burn mystery.
- Tired of seeing The Federation in shambles.
- Seriously, the source of The Burn was stupid.
- Discovery would be able to solve so, sooo many problems in this era.
- Did I mention the sad kid causing The Burn?
Season 4 - 8/10
Pros:
- More character development.
- Federation starting to get back on its feet.
- Interesting mystery around the “Dark Matter Anomaly” (DMA)
- We get to see The Federation deal with a truly alien first contact. Species 10-C was amazing.
Cons:
- Once again, an existential threat. Very exhausting.
Conclusion
I think Discovery suffered from one main issue, in multiple way: season-based plots. Since every season had a single main plot, any issues with the plot ruin the whole season. We don’t get standalone great episodes like in the old series, which you could watch at random. You kinda need to watch the whole season. Furthermore, since each season had to have a big plot, every season is dealing with a huge issue. It’s exhausting being in an existential crisis the entire time. That’s the feeling we have in our real world right now. That’s the reason I watch Star Trek; it’s a glimpse at how the future might be brighter. Discovery never felt like a promising future. It felt like we are going to be struggling for our lives for the next millennium and more.
So, I still enjoyed it as a piece of media, and a part of the Star Trek canon, but it’s not a show I see myself watching again and again like the rest of the franchise.
ApostleO@startrek.websiteto Star Trek@startrek.website•Episode Discussion | Star Trek: Lower Decks | 4x07 "A Few Badgeys More"English10·2 years agoWith the revelation that they are being taken, I immediately thought of Pria, from The Orville. Essentially, she was an agent from the future sent to steal The Orville for future collectors. The unidentified ship is clearly extremely powerful despite its small size, which screams time traveller to me. And they seem to be taking examples of ships from all different empires, as if for a collection.
My other thought is that it’s some party trying to turn all these empires against The Federation, as, to date, no Starfleet ships have been attacked. It’s not unreasonable that their neighbors could see that as suspicious, and conclude it’s an advanced Starfleet attack vessel.
Is this lasagna?