• Makeitstop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    That would only be an equivalent if you had the alternative of storing all your belongings in your own personal extradimensional space which is inaccessible to the thief, but instead chose to leave all your valuables sitting on your coffee table. It should be safe there, but it’s going to be a lot safer if it doesn’t occupy the same realm as the thief or the shitty lock.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      The alternative is to not have valuables and live an ascetic lifestyle. Valuables are just luxuries.

      You don’t need a TV, much like you don’t need to take nude selfies. Zero difference imo

      • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        The difference is that your house and TV are physical. You can try to secure them but, there’s nowhere else to put them.

        Unless you are snapping polaroids or using actual film, nude selfies are not physical things, just data. Data that exists purely offline is going to be as secure as any physical object, but data on a connected device or in a server somewhere is only as secure as the weakest link in the chain. Given the evaporation of privacy and the ever increasing trend of connecting accounts and storing everything in the cloud, and the overabundance of permissions that apps demand, it takes consistent effort to keep your data secure.

        How would you treat a picture of your credit card info? Or all your logins and passwords? Would you be comfortable just leaving it in your phone’s picture gallery? Would you knowingly store it in an icloud or onedrive account? Who would you be comfortable sending it to? How would you send it? Do you trust that other person’s data security practices?

        If you’re going to have a credit card, you should be aware of the potential risks so that you can protect yourself. It’s not all or nothing, there will always be some risk but the key is to be aware so you can make informed decisions and manage that risk. The same goes for any data which you want to remain private, including nudes.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          Don’t own anything you don’t want to get stolen. Still not seeing a difference. You don’t have to have a TV.

          • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Owning vs not owning is binary, all or nothing, a strict dichotomy.

            Data security and risk management is a vast spectrum of possibilities. We all make decisions about those risks, whether we acknowledge it or not. The risk is real, but not completely beyond our control. The more aware we are of the actual risks, and of the ways in which those risks can be mitigated, the more prepared we can be to make informed decisions. It’s not just whether or not you do something, but also how you do it.

            Ignoring risks doesn’t negate them. Privacy violations shouldn’t happen, but that doesn’t mean they won’t. The violator is the one who is wrong, the victim doesn’t deserve it, but that doesn’t undo what happened to them to make them the victim. Maybe we can make a better world someday where these things don’t happen, but until we do, this the reality we have to live with, and all we can do is exercise our best judgement.