Why do you find yourself opting for btop or htop instead of top? What advantages do these tools offer that make them superior to top in your opinion?

top has served me well, so I’m unsure why I would want to burden my system with the addition of htop or btop. With top, if you wish to terminate a process, simply press ‘k’ and send the signal; it’s that simple. If you’d like to identify the origin of a process, just include the command column.

I often find myself intrigued when encountering comments on posts expressing love for htop/btop. To me, it appears unnecessary or BLOATED!! Please do share your perspectives and help broaden my Linux knowledgebase.

  • DrillingStricken@programming.devOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Why do you think that? After this post, I will try out both of them but maybe eventually I will still just use top out of, same as you bro, habit.

    • 🌘 Umbra Temporis 🌒@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      I find htop to be far more legible, the white blocks of top aren’t for me. btop just seems a bit too much for my use, so I never caught on to it. I do believe btop to be better however, since the point of these programs is to see detailed statistics about your system and running programs. btop shoves a lot more information into your face. I really only open htop to find the PID of an app or to find what I need to debloat when I’m in a 1337 h4ck3rm4n mood and trying to make the most minimal system possible.