CucumberFetish@lemm.ee to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 9 months agoCostly rulelemm.eeimagemessage-square70fedilinkarrow-up1569arrow-down10
arrow-up1569arrow-down1imageCostly rulelemm.eeCucumberFetish@lemm.ee to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 9 months agomessage-square70fedilink
minus-squaredlok@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 months agoI’m just thinking of using what I already have… I also suspect there is an efficiency sweet spot than running at full capacity
minus-squareMiss Brainfarts@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·9 months agoOh, absolutely. The higher-end you go, the more the product is tuned for balls to the walls power with no consideration for efficiency. As the extreme example, the 4090 can deliver almost 94% of it’s full potential when limiting its power draw to about 70% and/or undervolting it. (Not exactly sure about the numbers, but you get the idea)
I’m just thinking of using what I already have… I also suspect there is an efficiency sweet spot than running at full capacity
Oh, absolutely. The higher-end you go, the more the product is tuned for balls to the walls power with no consideration for efficiency.
As the extreme example, the 4090 can deliver almost 94% of it’s full potential when limiting its power draw to about 70% and/or undervolting it.
(Not exactly sure about the numbers, but you get the idea)