• dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Are you saying buying a song and buying the rights to a song are the same? That would be a pretty smooth brain statement.

    If you are saying that your personal and non-commercial use is just a license in that it is in any way revokable after purchase, then yes I agree with you.

    • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      You can keep your derogatory language to yourself.

      I‘m saying if you buy a song, movie, art piece It is yours to do with as you please, forever.

      Thats what buying means.

      • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        You have to buy it (the rights for music or movie) to do as you please in an unlimited fashion, not buy a COPY of it. Otherwise it’s personal use only.

        Sorry if that’s too subtle to grasp.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          You’re making an irrelevant distinction here. If you buy a CD with a song on it, do you buy the rights to the song? Or a copy?

          A copy, right? You own a copy. The music corporation isn’t going to show up one day and repo your CD because of X, Y, Z reason. You have unlimited personal use of the copy. Not the rights to the whole song, but just the copy. You can play it in your car. You can play it in your walkman. You can loan it to a friend.

          But when you buy a digital copy, your ownership rights are dependent on them. It’s more like a lease with terms subject to change whenever the lessor wants, like because they got bought out or they lost the distribution rights or most commonly through pure incompetent inability to maintain the systems that they require you to use in order for you to use your copy.

          It’s almost impossible to just buy a .wav of a song anymore. Now when you “buy” a song it has a ton of restrictions on it, any one of which could prevent you from playing it. You can’t loan it to a friend. You can’t play it on a different device unless you log in to their systems. Sometimes you just lose access to it forever with no recourse.

          That’s what this post is about. Ownership of the copy, not the rights to the original. Literally no one is talking about the rights to the original. You just brought it up out of nowhere.

          • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            No youre bringing stuff up, read back. OP said a cd, not a digital copy. And when you buy a cd, you own a copy not rights. You can’t play the CD as part of your election campaign, or make it your eHitler Minecraft theme and publish it on YouTube. There are terms of use by which you must abide. OP said you buy it you own it and you do whatever you want and that is patently false for a CD which is their example not mine.

            If you want to talk about digital copies that is different in some ways you describe, but I. No world do you buy a copy of a song and have unlimited permission to do whatever you want

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              I specifically said “personal use”. Anything within personal use is fair game when you buy a CD. So no election campaigns, no selling it yourself. Personal use. That’s EXTREMELY different from a digital item that can poof at any time.

              And again, stop bringing up rights. No one is talking about rights to media. Totally different thing.

              • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                And haui, who I was replying to when you inserted yourself, specifically said a CD first and buy means buy. Did you not go back and see what you’re replying to? You jumped into a thread between two other people and youre making it about you.

                Again. Fucking REREAD IT and stop being a twit. Your point is valid for personal use but that was literally never at issue.

                • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  buy means buy

                  Friendo, I don’t know where you’re from, but I’ve never heard of a place where “I’m going to buy a Big Mac” means “I’m going to purchase the rights to the Big Mac”. You misinterpreted them, possibly on purpose.

                  • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    How do you read:

                    I‘m saying if you buy a song, movie, art piece It is yours to do with as you please, forever.

                    Friendo? It’s the wrong way. Because that perspective is misconstruing Ownership (ahem rights) and ownership.

                    You’re in the wrong conversation. Possibly on purpose.

        • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          As I said, thats the legal definition. Slavery used to be legal, abortion is illegal in many places.

          I dont care about your definition of right and wrong. If I buy something, it is mine.

          Blocked for repeated derogatory language.