silence7@slrpnk.netM to

Climate@slrpnk.netEnglish · 2 years ago

Direct air capture: An expensive, dangerous distraction from real climate solutions

thebulletin.org

106

Direct air capture: An expensive, dangerous distraction from real climate solutions

thebulletin.org

silence7@slrpnk.netM to

Climate@slrpnk.netEnglish · 2 years ago

Separating carbon dioxide from air, while technically straightforward, is outrageously expensive.

Chat

Star@lemmy.blahaj.zoneBanned
link
fedilink
arrow-up
5·
edit-2
2 years ago
Removed by mod

Climate@slrpnk.net

climate@slrpnk.net

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !climate@slrpnk.net

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

238 users / day
1.19K users / week
4.05K users / month
9.53K users / 6 months
1 local subscriber
8.65K subscribers
12.8K Posts
47.6K Comments
Modlog

mods:
silence7@slrpnk.net