inari@piefed.zip to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoAI’s recursive self-improvement might not come so quickly after allwww.technologyreview.comexternal-linkmessage-square51linkfedilinkarrow-up1148arrow-down18
arrow-up1140arrow-down1external-linkAI’s recursive self-improvement might not come so quickly after allwww.technologyreview.cominari@piefed.zip to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square51linkfedilink
minus-squareMangoCats@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down6·2 months agoA year ago they were similarly bad at writing code, often created unit tests that tested nothing, etc. If the models are trained in what they’re doing wrong, that can accelerate their progress toward doing it right.
minus-squaresourdough@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 months agoThey would need to be trained for open ended creative tasks, which is just hard in the current reinforcement learning paradigm.
minus-squareTrackinDaKraken@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoI think they’ll find infinite ways to fuck up. The guardrails will never be high enough, or strong enough.
minus-squarerichmondez@lemdro.idlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoThey still don’t get it right all the time, they just stacked a few together to filter out the obviously wrong stuff.
A year ago they were similarly bad at writing code, often created unit tests that tested nothing, etc.
If the models are trained in what they’re doing wrong, that can accelerate their progress toward doing it right.
They would need to be trained for open ended creative tasks, which is just hard in the current reinforcement learning paradigm.
I think they’ll find infinite ways to fuck up. The guardrails will never be high enough, or strong enough.
They still don’t get it right all the time, they just stacked a few together to filter out the obviously wrong stuff.