• roofuskit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Post effects haven’t been generative AI until more recently and it’s possible as a director he was unaware when they started creeping in to his work.

    The director or producer doesn’t directly oversee each special effect as it’s created. They might see a midpoint and an end after discussing what they want. The entire point of farming out effects to other firms is to divide the work to get it done faster. Worrying about generative AI creeping in is a more recent development so him not assuming a company would use it for effects is not weird.

    I am betting a bunch of effects companies have been using it more and more for years and have not been telling studios because why would they? If you’re in sales and you found a cheaper way to complete a contract you would not explain how to your customers, you would just bid lower on your contracts.

    Now that there’s public outcry suddenly there’s reason to disclose its use, and I bet effects firms are reluctant to because they’ve been relying on it for years to get work done.

    AI has been growing in effects work for at least a decade. Long before LLMs or generative AI ever creeped into the public mind.

    TL; DR Until recently there’s been no reason for a Director or Producer to know exactly how the special effects sausage is made.

    • bowsertattoo@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      the leads of a project should be held accountable for how things are made though. if you hire a firm, and you don’t want them to use ai, you better put that shit in the contract. audiences want disclosure of how stuff is made. nobody wants to pay their hard earned money if it’s fake/stolen work