• RT Redréovič@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Judging by post & history. They are just a troll. As for this article. I don’t understand why anyone bothers sharing it. It is one of the most hot garbage ones I have seen. Most of this article gives arguments that are either old, have no relevance here or are just plainly cherrypicked (the jitsi one for example, open the link and see the last comment, that they quoted). Most things are also application side issue with no relevance for wayland devs. “Oh my app does not work in wayland? Must be wayland’s fault!” This is a rubbish logicless argument. If one wants to not use Wayland, they are welcome. But things like “Boycott Wayland” are irritating to those who do want to use Wayland because they know how Xorg is.

      • Lojcs@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh my app does not work in wayland? Must be wayland’s fault!

        Aka Python 3 isn’t Turing complete

    • safefel556@sh.itjust.works
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      42
      ·
      1 year ago

      concise list of criticisms
      “ramblings”

      This is why wheyland is destined to fail. The fact that criticisms can be dismissed as ramblings explains a lot of things.

      • danielton@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is a rambling of how Wayland supposedly forces everybody to use GNOME, which is BS.

        The rant even includes an admission that the author didn’t even know what Wayland was when it was written.