Either way, sounds like there is more than one representation of god that would be capable of having hands, so it’s probably just one of those instead of Jesus in the painting.
That was a depiction of the Ancient of Days according to Daniel’s vision. Although western Christians do believe the Ancient of Days to be God The Father. Basically every denomination apart from Roman Catholics frown upon depicting God The Father.
Wild.
Either way, sounds like there is more than one representation of god that would be capable of having hands, so it’s probably just one of those instead of Jesus in the painting.
It’s possible, but what I was saying originally was a joke. Although the hand of God depicted Anno Domini is typically depicted with the hole.
Someone better tell Michelangelo!
That was a depiction of the Ancient of Days according to Daniel’s vision. Although western Christians do believe the Ancient of Days to be God The Father. Basically every denomination apart from Roman Catholics frown upon depicting God The Father.