• _core@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Ray tracing is cool but the screenshots in the video just destroy the atmosphere by making everything day bright.

  • hisao@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    This looks great, I wonder if it’s possible for all this DLSS and similar tech to get rid of severe input lag. No matter how good it looks, I wouldn’t play a shooter with input lag.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    So this might be a stupid question considering how tied to Nvidia it seems to be, but… will run on the new AMD 90-series cards that can actually do ray-tracing?

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        So I’ve been reading up on it a little bit and it seems like raytracing is part of Vulkan and DirectX 12, so the APIs shouldn’t be proprietary the way CUDA and PhysX are…right?

        • kayzeekayzee@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          In theory, yea it should. But this is developed by Nvidia with their own graphics cards in mind. If this is similar to Portal RTX, then RDNA3 cards will be able to run it, just with severly crippled performance.

          • Trollception@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yea but isn’t AMDs ray tracing performance severely crippled in general? I thought if you want to use ray tracing your far better of buying from team green.

  • AMillionMonkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    So who’s actually developing it? If it was Valve they would have said…
    I already own HL2, but presumably I would have to buy this anew.