People can have whatever opinion on whether the shooter was right or not. But the person who modified a gun, shot his target thrice in the middle of a city, left a James Bond style message on the bullets, and rode off into the sunset without leaving a single clear photo on any nearby camera is obviously not the man who got arrested eating a meal in broad daylight with a gun and a written confession conveniently packed in his bag.
We’re getting to conspiracy theory levels of fear here, I’m pretty sure you have less information than the FBI. Just say that you like rich people dying and stop making excuses
By definition of the word, yes.
For all other purposes, no.
Not even by the definition. He’s accused of murder. He hasn’t been proven guilty.
so funny seeing lemmy bounce around “he killed him so good” and “he didnt kill him it hasnt been proven in a court of law!”
It’s either one or the other dood
People can have whatever opinion on whether the shooter was right or not. But the person who modified a gun, shot his target thrice in the middle of a city, left a James Bond style message on the bullets, and rode off into the sunset without leaving a single clear photo on any nearby camera is obviously not the man who got arrested eating a meal in broad daylight with a gun and a written confession conveniently packed in his bag.
We’re getting to conspiracy theory levels of fear here, I’m pretty sure you have less information than the FBI. Just say that you like rich people dying and stop making excuses
“yeah bro he’s a murderer, but he killed someone bad so he ISN’T a murderer!”
No comment