• CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This will blow your mind, but datacenters still buy tapes. It’s just stupid cheap. In the future, chemical storage by DNA or something similar might play the same role for cold storage.

      • Dohnakun@lemmy.fmhy.mlB
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t get why we research DNA as storage.

        It is sensible as fuck, deteriorates quickly, is slow to write and read…

        Only advantage it’s bio-compatibility

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The information density is insane, both volumetric and by mass.

          I sort of agree, though. With current methods it seems like it would probably be just as easy to record information in a synthetic polymer.

    • Ignotum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Still cheaper, i use them for large volumes of data that isn’t read or written that often

    • zbecker@mastodon.zbecker.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      @Chev @produnis

      As the other guy said, because they are way cheaper. I use them for media storage.

      For 20tb of hard drive storage, you could expect to spend ~$400 (probably less these days), but the same price will get you a 5th that on ssds (maybe more these days)

      If you are streaming video, hard drive read speeds are good enough.