I wouldn’t quite say I’m demanding an explanation. I would hope you see it as having a discussion with a typical who is genuinely trying to understand and is willing to modify behaviors if they are problematic.
Yes, with you, I do see it that way, because you have very much indicated a genuine desire to understand and learn.
That is why I prefaced that section with “If you had only said this, my response would be blah blah.”
It was a hypothetical. I felt it was worth writing out because a lot of people do the ‘why are you so offended?’ as a careless, uninquisitive attempt to paint the offended person as basically unreasonable and hysterical.
Please don’t feel like I’m demanding your time or attention. If you need to tell me to fuck off, that’s cool, won’t hurt my feelings. If you need to space out your responses, I don’t need an immediate reply, take as long as you want.
I believe you, appreciate you saying it, and have the same sentiment toward you. =)
I don’t know what it is, but you can’t throw a stick without hitting a neurodiverse person within our subculture.
…
Another commonality among neurodiverse folks that I’ve noticed is that they are far more likely to be bi or some sort of trans.
My theory on this is basically:
neurodiverse people tend to basically just inherently give less of a shit about existing predominant social and lifestyle norms, as we tend to view them as just then currently existing ‘rules’ of society, which have objectively changed and shifted over time and place… basically we are more likely to see many social rules as arbitrary, very often justified by nonsense.
we are more likely to be shunned and misunderstood by society in general, so we are more likely to gravitate toward some kind of smaller, accepting, ‘found family’ type of social environment.
Anyhow, savant or savant-like behaviors. Yeah, it’s not a great term. But, you know what I mean. It’s totally a thing.
I do know what you mean, I understand.
I am just very, very used to people in my life treating me in an absolute, binary way.
Either I am a genius who is just expected to solve absurdly complex theoretical problems for them, which takes hours and hours of time, and this is just expected of me, without any compensation or recognition or thanks, whatsoever…
Or, I get ‘Sir this is a Wendy’s’, laughed at and mocked when I do it of my own accord and they entirely don’t fucking care whatsoever.
My questions about ‘Why’ would they do that are rhetorical. Those behaviors, even as a hobby, would never occur to me in a million years.
A whole lot of people use a rhetorical question as basically a derisive, sarcastic insult.
But not all people. Some people ask what others view as rhetorical questions as literal, actual questions. They actually want an answer.
And some people use it as an equivalent of a completely different statement or emotional expression.
In your case, when you ask ‘why would someone do this?’ what you actually mean is ‘wow, that’s so wild, I would never think anyone would do this as a hobby!’.
But many others use ‘why would you do that?’ to mainly indicate anger or shock… instead of just… saying that they are angry and shocked. In that case, basically there is no acceptable, meaningful response, (beyond emotionally sympathizing with the rhetorical question asker) despite it being phrased as a question, which prompts a response.
Sometimes some people do all of these things, at different times, and some people people will start off with one intention and then in the same conversation flip it around to other intentions.
This is outstandingly confusing to me, because almost everyone has a different way they will tell you that languages and phrases like this work when they and other people use them, but they all insist their way they is the way everyone acts.
The reality is that everyone sends and reads context and intonation clues differently to specify the actual intent behind a rhetorical question… but basically all neurotypicals act like the way they do it is the objective universal standard.
This has actually been studied and is not me just making up an ‘opinion’ here.
Neurotypicals, on average, misinterpret roughly 50% of ambiguous social cues during conversation, but generally estimate that they only miss around 10%.
Neurodivergents are much more likely to ask for clarity when they reach a social cue they realize is ambiguous, and are likely to get a rude, dismissive, angry… some kind of negative response for doing so, from a neurotypical.
I suppose that’s what I’m really trying to ask. You’ll see the term ‘autist’ used as an explanation, ‘neuro’ in this case. You, and other autistic people, can find this offensive, and rightfully so. Is there an inoffensive term for these behaviors?
There absolutely are behavior patterns that are objectively, correctly associated with certain ‘diagnoses’ of specific kinds of neurodivergence.
With ‘neuro’ as a blanket term, you run into the whole problem of conflating a particular diagnosis’s patterns with each other, as I’ve already outlined.
But anyway…as with other terms that can be, but are not always used as slurs… intent, context, manner of usage, who is using it… all that stuff matters as well.
“The autist has an esoteric, information/analysis centric hobby, that’s so hilarious, of course he does, hahah!”
… is different than
“Oh, the guy with the information/analysis centric hobby is autistic. Well, that makes sense.”
The former is laughing at someone for… doing what would be completely expected for that person to do. It is mockery.
The latter is just noting that a completely reasonable explanation is reasonable.
Its just stereotype insult comedy, the bottom of the barrel, cheapest way to get a laugh out of an audience that doesn’t mainly consist of the demographic you’re insulting, but is only aware of stereotypes.
… If you told a joke that was maybe more involved, maybe played off of how a compounding series of autistic behavior patterns combined in some way to lead to an absurd problem, or maybe cancel each other out in a non obvious way… that would probably be more likely to not be viewed as just an insult, as relatable, funny.
If you’re just looking to swap out a word with another word that has exactly the same meaning … then nothing changes.
You’re now just saying “thought it was a bot, turns out its a skrimbloob. hilarious every time!”
Still has the same intent and meaning.
I often use the term Autist to describe myself when I realize I’ve misread a social cue or am doing waaay more investigation and analysis into a topic than most people would do.
I’m not insulting myself.
I’m just stating it as an accurate descriptor.
Its fine to use the term if you are not using it to infantilize, to dismiss, to deride, to mock someone or something simply because they or the behavior is are autistic.
In private playful conversations with my wife, it’s not uncommon for me to call her a “fucking autist” or call her actions ‘autistic.’ This might also occur among close friends. It’s absolutely a slur. I would never, ever, do so publicly.Note that she calls me ‘old man’, calls me ‘bald’ or makes fun of my baldness, makes fun of my ileostomy, makes fun of my accent and so on. We use slurs, in play, for each other all the time. Publicly, it’s very common that I’m the butt of the group jokes because it’s obvious that it doesn’t bother me and I’m an easy and willing target for that sort of humor.
I am not you or your wife, but I would find this offensive and toxic, on both sides.
I really don’t like relationships where a normal component of them is insults.
But apparently for yourself and your wife, other people you are close with, this is normal in private, and you … know it is offensive to do so in a public setting where people may overhear it.
… I know a lot of people have relationships where ‘playful’ insults are normalized to the point where its 75% or more of the spoken exchanges.
I have never understood this, and I don’t like being in such situations.
An occasional playful jab is one thing, but I’ve been in waaaay too many romantic and platonic relationships where it occurs basically all the time.
But if it works for you and her, great, I’m not gonna say its objectively bad, just that I wouldn’t enjoy that kind of dynamic at all.
That’s a whole other thing that happens to me with the neurodiverse. The pure fucking joy they get from playfully picking on me is something else. It’s apparently quite a thrill. Very timid about calling me bald, old, or whatever at first. My wife or friends are usually the ringleaders. I guess it feels subversive or something? I just growl, grumble or frown back with the very timid.
Again, I don’t get this.
I would think those neurodiverse people are being needlessly cruel.
As a typical, when it’s pointed out that the person that engages in the behavior is neurodiverse, it’s an ‘aha’ moment often mixed with humor. It would be nice if it had an inoffensive label.
As an Autist, I don’t see why it would be mixed with humor.
Why did the person go to the party?
Because they’re more extraverted than introverted.
Ha… ha?
Why did the other person bring so many cooking ingredients to that party?
Yes, with you, I do see it that way, because you have very much indicated a genuine desire to understand and learn.
That is why I prefaced that section with “If you had only said this, my response would be blah blah.”
It was a hypothetical. I felt it was worth writing out because a lot of people do the ‘why are you so offended?’ as a careless, uninquisitive attempt to paint the offended person as basically unreasonable and hysterical.
I believe you, appreciate you saying it, and have the same sentiment toward you. =)
My theory on this is basically:
neurodiverse people tend to basically just inherently give less of a shit about existing predominant social and lifestyle norms, as we tend to view them as just then currently existing ‘rules’ of society, which have objectively changed and shifted over time and place… basically we are more likely to see many social rules as arbitrary, very often justified by nonsense.
we are more likely to be shunned and misunderstood by society in general, so we are more likely to gravitate toward some kind of smaller, accepting, ‘found family’ type of social environment.
I do know what you mean, I understand.
I am just very, very used to people in my life treating me in an absolute, binary way.
Either I am a genius who is just expected to solve absurdly complex theoretical problems for them, which takes hours and hours of time, and this is just expected of me, without any compensation or recognition or thanks, whatsoever…
Or, I get ‘Sir this is a Wendy’s’, laughed at and mocked when I do it of my own accord and they entirely don’t fucking care whatsoever.
A whole lot of people use a rhetorical question as basically a derisive, sarcastic insult.
But not all people. Some people ask what others view as rhetorical questions as literal, actual questions. They actually want an answer.
And some people use it as an equivalent of a completely different statement or emotional expression.
In your case, when you ask ‘why would someone do this?’ what you actually mean is ‘wow, that’s so wild, I would never think anyone would do this as a hobby!’.
But many others use ‘why would you do that?’ to mainly indicate anger or shock… instead of just… saying that they are angry and shocked. In that case, basically there is no acceptable, meaningful response, (beyond emotionally sympathizing with the rhetorical question asker) despite it being phrased as a question, which prompts a response.
Sometimes some people do all of these things, at different times, and some people people will start off with one intention and then in the same conversation flip it around to other intentions.
This is outstandingly confusing to me, because almost everyone has a different way they will tell you that languages and phrases like this work when they and other people use them, but they all insist their way they is the way everyone acts.
The reality is that everyone sends and reads context and intonation clues differently to specify the actual intent behind a rhetorical question… but basically all neurotypicals act like the way they do it is the objective universal standard.
This has actually been studied and is not me just making up an ‘opinion’ here.
Neurotypicals, on average, misinterpret roughly 50% of ambiguous social cues during conversation, but generally estimate that they only miss around 10%.
Neurodivergents are much more likely to ask for clarity when they reach a social cue they realize is ambiguous, and are likely to get a rude, dismissive, angry… some kind of negative response for doing so, from a neurotypical.
There absolutely are behavior patterns that are objectively, correctly associated with certain ‘diagnoses’ of specific kinds of neurodivergence.
With ‘neuro’ as a blanket term, you run into the whole problem of conflating a particular diagnosis’s patterns with each other, as I’ve already outlined.
But anyway…as with other terms that can be, but are not always used as slurs… intent, context, manner of usage, who is using it… all that stuff matters as well.
“The autist has an esoteric, information/analysis centric hobby, that’s so hilarious, of course he does, hahah!”
… is different than
“Oh, the guy with the information/analysis centric hobby is autistic. Well, that makes sense.”
The former is laughing at someone for… doing what would be completely expected for that person to do. It is mockery.
The latter is just noting that a completely reasonable explanation is reasonable.
Its just stereotype insult comedy, the bottom of the barrel, cheapest way to get a laugh out of an audience that doesn’t mainly consist of the demographic you’re insulting, but is only aware of stereotypes.
… If you told a joke that was maybe more involved, maybe played off of how a compounding series of autistic behavior patterns combined in some way to lead to an absurd problem, or maybe cancel each other out in a non obvious way… that would probably be more likely to not be viewed as just an insult, as relatable, funny.
If you’re just looking to swap out a word with another word that has exactly the same meaning … then nothing changes.
You’re now just saying “thought it was a bot, turns out its a skrimbloob. hilarious every time!”
Still has the same intent and meaning.
I often use the term Autist to describe myself when I realize I’ve misread a social cue or am doing waaay more investigation and analysis into a topic than most people would do.
I’m not insulting myself.
I’m just stating it as an accurate descriptor.
Its fine to use the term if you are not using it to infantilize, to dismiss, to deride, to mock someone or something simply because they or the behavior is are autistic.
I am not you or your wife, but I would find this offensive and toxic, on both sides.
I really don’t like relationships where a normal component of them is insults.
But apparently for yourself and your wife, other people you are close with, this is normal in private, and you … know it is offensive to do so in a public setting where people may overhear it.
… I know a lot of people have relationships where ‘playful’ insults are normalized to the point where its 75% or more of the spoken exchanges.
I have never understood this, and I don’t like being in such situations.
An occasional playful jab is one thing, but I’ve been in waaaay too many romantic and platonic relationships where it occurs basically all the time.
But if it works for you and her, great, I’m not gonna say its objectively bad, just that I wouldn’t enjoy that kind of dynamic at all.
Again, I don’t get this.
I would think those neurodiverse people are being needlessly cruel.
As an Autist, I don’t see why it would be mixed with humor.
Why did the person go to the party?
Because they’re more extraverted than introverted.
Ha… ha?
Why did the other person bring so many cooking ingredients to that party?
Because they’re a trained chef.
Haha wow that’s … so… unexpected? … ???