GEICO, the second-largest vehicle insurance underwriter in the US, has decided it will no longer cover Tesla Cybertrucks. The company is terminating current Cybertruck policies and says the truck “doesn’t meet our underwriting guidelines.”

  • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    People knowingly buy stupid vehicles. I’m one of them. It’s expensive to drive, big, has expensive insurance and only seats two but I love it.

    • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I didn’t realise they only had two seats!

      Is that one for each of your brain cells? 😉

      • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Someone with more than two brain cells could easily look that up and and realize they’re talking about a different vehicle before insulting a complete stranger for no reason.

        • turtletracks@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Why comment in the first place then? We’re talking about Cybertrucks and you start talking about your vehicle, people are gonna assume you mean the Cybertruck

          • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Also is anyone else stupid enough to buy one?

            Because I’m pointing out that people don’t only buy vehicles based on what’s wise or optimal. For some, it’s also a hobby and they have different preferences as what to drive. At the time of buying my current truck, a wagon would’ve been sufficient. I just went with what’s essentially my childhood-dream car instead. I’ve since developed an actual need for one too, but even now, a van would be a little more practical. Truck is simply more fun and nicer looking, while being the same size.

            • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              You can see why people misunderstood you though no?

              I asked “is anyone else stupid enough to buy [a Cybertruck]”

              You replied - [context as assumed by a normal person]

              People knowingly buy stupid vehicles. I’m one of the m [people that bought this fuckin monstrosity]. [The Cybertruck is] expensive to drive, big, has expensive insurance and only seats two but I love it.

        • IGuessThisIsForNSFW@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          I thought ‘expensive to drive’ would have given away it wasn’t a cybertruck, since the only good part about those things is that it’s an EV and probably doesn’t cost much to charge. I might not agree with your decision to drive a huge vehicle, but I’m not gonna call anyone an idiot for doing it.

          It’s also generally good form to not make spelling errors (realise) in a comment calling someone else stupid…

          • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Please tell me the comment about the spelling mistake is some kind of weird humour (sic)

            • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Sorry mate, your comment really makes it sound like you were starved of oxygen at birth and bought a Cybertruck.

              As you were

        • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Yeah I think they would be alright personal use offroad vehicles. Although they didnt build them for that, they could have.

      • Kalysta@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        They likely didn’t know they were dangerous when they preordered and many are now stuck with them. I think they have a no resale contract for 2 years after buying.

        • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I mean I don’t mean to sound ridiculous, but they even looked dangerous. I am not sure why anyone would assume they were safe. I didn’t even think they were street legal at first.

          That is a bummer to be stuck with one though, but you do have to be rich enough to buy one too.