That’s a distinction without a difference. The machine doing the inference is not the same machine doing the learning. From the perspective of the machine doing LLM inference, it could not tell you if the table was hand rolled by a human, fitted using ML or just a table of random noise.

Technically right in that it doesn’t necessarily translate audio into text, but that’s hardly the point. The point is someone gives the LLM a giant table that directs its response.

I think you grasp the point, it is exactly what an LLM does

Being critAI is being proAI.

Makes me wonder why we even bother with burying radioactive waste.

Someone give this person a congressional hearing and billions of dollars to burn

At least that hole wouldn’t spew lies

Milo got in trouble for criticising Isreal. Maybe if he sucked off Trump like Loomer did he might still be on this side of the pond.

And if we had universal healthcare it would actually be cheaper to produce those cars. Canada is proof of this.

“Oil unable to navigate Trump’s Strait”

“Ships lost trying to cross Trump’s Strait”

I think if I said this enough times I would likely say “Trump’s taint”, it kinda ryhmes

So much of our political malaise boils down to thinly vieled daddy issues.

Epstein class wants to make sure the people doing the investigation are understanding…

Because it would be immensely stupid

Maybe we can’t but climate change could.

Talk about a loss for all those who voted for irresponsible use of AI /s

This is what share holder value looks like.

If she said “Trump is cancelling Thanksgiving for many families because his war in Iran is driving up grocery costs” it would have been a slam dunk.

Thank you for explaining that to me and expressing how you feel.

If you want to argue then address the first three sentences rebutting your argument. If you want to express your feelings you address the personal. I gave you both options and you chose the latter. Consider me your free internet schizo therapist.

That’s a non-sequitur. A group of people banding together to protect themselves is not automarically an *archy. Nor does it follow they are secretly in control. I think you are describing your own personal reality then the reality at large. Do women really control your life so much that you feel you are not in control of your own life? Can you cite an example for us to analyze?