Couterpoint to eating human bodies?

still above reddit

The point of the comment is to point out the common misconception that the value of one [token of a currency] has anything to do with the strength of a currency. As described in the comment, the value of a singular token of a currency can be chosen arbitrarily.

This, of course, doesn’t mean the map is factually incorrect.

I do have an idea how “a difficult to kill, unwanted growth” could be put into relation to a war fueled by hatred.

In LibreTube, you can go to

Settings > Instance > Disable Piped proxy

I only ever had issues with the piped proxy, not with the app itself.

How does GrapheneOS “lack boldly”?

Because they want their voice chats to be monitored?

Where do you get all these Coca Cola flavours? I’m in Germany and have only ever seen vanilla, lemon, cherry and life (next to the default, light and zero).

Instead of comparing it to a ball with colour on it, you could compare it to a ball of colour. Which atoms are.

That browser hasn’t been updated in a year.

Your field of view is wider than it is high. So if you look at something higher than it is wide (which many living things are) it’s more centered and clearer to see.

Is this standardized sizing for men’s clothes in the room with us right now?

What am I looking at?

I hope this gets ported to Windows. I use Linux, but many of my friends don’t and won’t.

I recently (two months ago) had to work with an Excel sheet which worked on OnlyOffice but not LibreOffice. So compatibility seems to still not be on par.

I’m not a native english speaker. I’m sorry if my spelling makes my comments difficult to read.

I think I mostly understood the point by now.

(I still don’t get why the man would be uncomfortable with the alternative hypersexualization, since he already perceives the initial depiction as hypersexualized, but that doesn’t seem to be central to the point anyways.)

It’s not a real quote. It’s the meaning I understood this post to imply.

(My interpretation was already challenged by @Crozekiel below.)

deleted by creator

It didn’t load for me either. It did load when I opened the post in my browser.

(I think the difference is that it adds ?format=webp in the browser.)

https://pictrs.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/65a49e6b-bf3c-4cf1-82ce-0f223ac8dadb.jpeg?format=webp

the man in the comic became uncomfortable seeing it

I don’t understand this point. The reason they’re uncomfortable with it is because they’re drawn in a sexualized manner? But even if all else is true, men in comics are already drawn in a way that many men think is attractive.

At least that’s how I understand the point of the “power fantasy”. Or do they mean literal physical strength with the “power fantasy”? Because the sexualization of men is definitely not limited to muscles.

Assuming the power fantasy is not just about physical strength, but also (or only) about extreme attractiveness (as perceived by men):

That is an idea that could be true. Are there statistics about how close the typical male hypersexualization is to women’s interests compared to how close the typical female hypersexualization is to men’s interests?