yes, what is your point? this is an “ad Hominem” attack: attacking my character do not make what google is doing, any better! You’re just trying to diffuse the subject. The subject is Google, not me. How bad I am, or act , is irrelevant to google evil doing. Me being literal Hitler would not change the fact that google is still an evil corporation. And talking about me, is just to protect google.

btw this is also me defending trans : https://lemm.ee/post/54824951 or me writing 3 cyoa books with no imposed gender and allowing the reader to romance any gender you want: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CW17G2GV

Instead of looking for the bad in people, may be use half that energy looking for the bad in the system, help with representation , and enjoy some levity once in a while. And in case you’re a google/corporate Shill… learn proper argumentation, “ad hominem argument” are easy to spot and to counter.

is wanting to destroy google politics talk?

backlash? where? did google received any complaint ever?

pleasing the power, so they remove any law that protect our privacy against google prying eye

What is infuriating, is that some government official website in my country used google captcha

most real-life villain thinks they are doing good. JK Rowling rhetoric is all about “protecting women”. She probably is certain she is some sort of martyr trying to save the world

so 3 different agenda, with the same result. Probably it is as coincidental as that

astute observation. Zuckerberg with all his new 'masculine energy" stuff, could still fit in your approach: he dont accept his woman side

yeah may be it’s just rich people having a louder voice . But trans existed for a long time, and we never heard so much vitriol against them until a few decade back

very interesting take. Thanks

she seems pretty vocal about it : https://theweek.com/feature/1020838/jk-rowlings-transphobia-controversy-a-complete-timeline

I get it. But that smokescreen is achieved with anti-immigrant rhetoric. Throwing Trans in , seems so random

You might be right: it’s a rebranding of anti-gay sentiment.