This just in! “Funny” at lemmy instance “Shit Just Works” not a news community!

I guess I’ll forgive the misuse of “POV” for the relatively high effort joke. Lol.

Do you know where “appropriate regions” are?

deleted by creator

Assuming newer versions are derived from code that was licensed GPL in the old version, the newer versions (which include new code) are also licensed GPL, whether the person writing the new code likes it or not.

If it’s guaranteed to not be None, why is it an Option?

Kind of is though

Haha! I had the same thought.

A stunning example of missing the point.

If I saw a dude in pastel athleisure holding a green juice- maybe I’m giving away the population density 'round here- but I think I’d do a triple-take.

I believe that falls under “infrastructure”

I’m a software engineer, and I don’t even know what a v&v engineer is.

lo sofybakni?

Ah, thanks.

Realistically one can come up with any number of axes and still be wrong, because the domain of politics isn’t a metric space.

Never before have I seen an owl with eyes and beak of quite such a brilliant yellow.

It looks as though it’s discovered some new psychoactive substance on which humans have not yet got their hands.

Shift + tab?

There’s nothing wrong with manually breaking a loop.

That’s a political compass, and it’s still missing several political axes.

If the cert is not unique to a person, it’s not a viable way of verifying age. Anyone could use one issued to anyone else, and the whole thing is DOA.

So then we have to assume it is uniquely tied to a person. Then, it can be used by the verification service to track a person, building a profile of what websites they visit and when, even what they do there, depending on how the age verification is set up.

Advertisers don’t really care about your name, just about your profile so they can target you with ads, so it gives them everything they want.