Who’s that Harold guy? Is he a friend of yours?
- 1 Post
- 113 Comments
huppakee@lemmy.worldto
Mildly Interesting@lemmy.world•Possum vs. Opossum: What's The Real Difference?
5·1 day agoTldr; their name is basically the same, their face is basically the same, but the rest is different.
huppakee@lemmy.worldto
Not The Onion@lemmy.world•Furby is now a sexy anime girl figureEnglish
41·1 day agoI feel like sexy anime girl is a cheat code for unprofitable businesses.
huppakee@lemmy.worldto
Not The Onion@lemmy.world•Surprised doctors find 10-inch worm in man's groin during elective surgeryEnglish
2·2 days agoJust watch baby
huppakee@lemmy.worldto
Not The Onion@lemmy.world•Farage left fighting a trash can as the UK populist leader’s election gamble backfiresEnglish
2·2 days agoHe would if they make him pm, but that’s not what this is about lucky for him
huppakee@lemmy.worldto
Not The Onion@lemmy.world•Farage left fighting a trash can as the UK populist leader’s election gamble backfiresEnglish
10·2 days agoThe one flaw in that plan: people end up seeing that face and realize he really isn’t that stunning at all.
huppakee@lemmy.worldto
Not The Onion@lemmy.world•Nato leaders agree not to mention World Cup to Donald Trump to avoid irritating himEnglish
11·4 days agoThe US in it’s current form is definitely a threat to Europe in many ways, but not a military one. Not even in the case of an armed conflict about Greenland. I could see the leadership ordering to, but I can’t see the soldiers on the ground shoot at people they’ve been training and fighting with their entire career. There will be mass defection on the side of the US if they are ordered to shoot (by then former) nato-allies. Unlike Russian ‘soldiers’, the fear of torture/execution will not motivate them.
huppakee@lemmy.worldto
Not The Onion@lemmy.world•Nato leaders agree not to mention World Cup to Donald Trump to avoid irritating himEnglish
251·4 days agoYou mean that’s a the people at risk problem
huppakee@lemmy.worldto
Not The Onion@lemmy.world•Nato leaders agree not to mention World Cup to Donald Trump to avoid irritating himEnglish
111·4 days agoWorking towards 5% isn’t really that stupid for most European countries as long as Russia is spending as much money as it can on weapons. It will only become a waste of money after the implosion of the Russian oligarchy. I am not in favor of spending that much money of things that kill stuff, but it makes total sense to continue doing that for now.
According to a study published in Nature, almost two-thirds of global warming is caused by the wealthiest 10% of the world.
Guess you forgot to put that in bold, i’ll fix it for you:
According to a study published in Nature, almost two-thirds of global warming is caused by the wealthiest 10% of the world.
Cool share, but too much to just delve into. Leaving a comment so i can easily check back in a few days and seee if somebody left a highlight or two.
huppakee@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•“This Is Unfair” American A.I. companies say Chinese competitors are copying their A.I English
4·6 days agoJust because the those models don’t show / use your chat history doesn’t mean they can’t store it. More a warning than a counter argument though.
huppakee@lemmy.worldto
Games@sh.itjust.works•I can't justify spending $80 on a game I won't own.English
4·6 days agoIf I were going to make an argument for pre-ordering digital games, the only one I can think of is basically that you can pre-download the game
Sure but that leaves no valid reason to pre-order a few months before launch, instead of a few days.
huppakee@lemmy.worldto
Games@sh.itjust.works•I can't justify spending $80 on a game I won't own.English
4·6 days agoA transferable licence on a hard copy definitely beats a non-transferable digital license for sure, but for any online game being able to play is obviously not only related to your local hardware and copy. We’re definitely going down a shitty road, but it’s not like we’re not already on it.
huppakee@lemmy.worldto
Games@sh.itjust.works•I can't justify spending $80 on a game I won't own.English
2·6 days agoHighest price is not necessarily most best for profit. They likely calculated that selling it for 70 or 90 means less profit then selling it for 80.
huppakee@lemmy.worldto
Games@sh.itjust.works•I can't justify spending $80 on a game I won't own.English
2·6 days agoIf consoles didn’t give them a sweetheart deal we would see a PC release day 1.
There could be other reasons for that though (although i wouldn’t be surprised if you’re right)
huppakee@lemmy.worldto
Games@sh.itjust.works•I can't justify spending $80 on a game I won't own.English
1·6 days agoIf it is yes, but afaik they won’t do that for gta
huppakee@lemmy.worldto
Games@sh.itjust.works•I can't justify spending $80 on a game I won't own.English
7·6 days agoEven if your IQ < 1 those are solid arguments.
huppakee@lemmy.worldto
Mildly Interesting@lemmy.world•Poll: 46% of Americans Unaware of July 4 Meaning (Poll from Cato Institute)
6·6 days agoThese people not to be educated. Please make it affordable for everybody.


Either way it’ll leave you with two different animals. Why make it extra confusing and spell their names the same?