well my point and standing is not hypothetical. try again.
well my point and standing is not hypothetical. try again.
no no. the impossible part is that he’s already dead. you cannot be presented with your example.
your ultimatum was impossible to answer and absurd, so no.
think so
well then, you’re fucking wrong.
also “save life” different than “attempt”
reductio ad absurdum.
the guy having a heart attack by the mcdonalds with nazi tattoos is a nazi. not the same as literal hitler. still an inhuman piece of shit. still worthless. still required to provide care. not the target of a worldwide multinational military operation requiring millions of russians to take berlin.
the right to refuse providing life saving service to someone? even if I consider the person no longer a human because they chose to become a nazi?
not an actual right. if you can’t provide it, to everyone, even people who disgust you, you’re in the wrong industry.
never have refused. never will.
I agree there. The talkin shit after is where the “fun” happens. Because yeah. We have to treat but that doesn’t mean we need to not process what we just went through.
what about uniformed nazis or uniformed zionists?
Yeah. like shortening words into a few letters, shake my head…
Just not sure where to rant but an adhd moment at work today in a team meeting. (software) I suggested something. Senior guy suggested I was wrong, and gave an improvement he said he would talk to me abt later. I said thanks. Sent him a quick email asking him to use it as a convo starter so we could document this change. Told him in the meeting to reply to the email later at his convenience. He refused. in open. in front of rest of team. And crankily saying “I’ll just tell you in my cube later.” I had to push, hard , and feel like a stupid idiot. Till I finally told him the email is to help me document this change not you. Because of my adhd. He says he doesn’t like designing things via email. No I feel all frazzled. Anxious. Yadda yadda. and just want to crawl back to bed.
deleted by creator
And I so fully support banning calls for violence. in my example (anecdotally) there was no violence just uncomfortable rhetoric. (also he was a mod of news on .world at the time - not just his instance but maybe that’s how it works here? not fully sure.)
A) I never advocated violence. I support a prohibition on such actions.
B) I did not arbitrarily label anyone anything. The subjects themselves did it. I merely used the labels they give themselves in my commentary about the kinds of people they are.
C) I am in no way, shape, or form a liberal.
oh did not know abt those bans. he got me when I posted intolerance of nazis because I was “dehumanizing” them. but yeah. as a dev good! administration was just too much for him.
as a dev sure. as an admin he had a recent kerfuffle on news, etc, with bans and involvement in some drama around them.
it’s not the fault or ownership of the AI; but the corporation/org running it. We need to not create obfuscation when referring to this stuff.
Nazis at grok ( its owner, etc ) create and run it. They are the problem.
1/3rd? 3/3rds is more like it. profit being stolen wage and all that. ;)
“Don’t cut yourself on all that edge, bro.” - Abe Lincoln