Why do marginalized users keep using that website at all?

Here in the USA, the overwhelming majority of poor people eat meat; even the homeless! They just get low-quality processed meat instead.

Honestly I’d rather be called a lib tankie 100x than get banned because I said the wrong thing to an actual fascist. Leftists infight, none of us are above that, so one always has to remember that the vegan prick you’re arguing with will still eat the rich with you.

This will probably become an ever-worsening problem because there’s no way to ban anyone from the fediverse entirely. We might someday need something like adblock or spam filters to reduce noise.

I can’t remember where, but I’ve seen batman using one of those bars where you hang with special shoes to stretch your back.

I don’t think he knows about second jerkfast, Pip.

No offense but why do you think it works that way at all?

Wait how exactly does rolling help? I can understand catching the victim sooner to accelerate upwards over a longer time period.

Not every transaction, just the ones that open and close payment channels. This deletes data that would be needed to reconstruct an overwhelming majority of transactions.

(This is how Bitcoin’s lightning network works.)

If he doesn’t like hoarding, why doesn’t it just inflate?

Couldn’t they run a Chaumian digital cash server? It’s got top notch privacy, with the only downside of being a trusted central authority… which fiat currencies need anyways.

It’s because you’re taking a stance against cashless, which sounds paranoid and weird to most people.

Take a stand against VISA and PayPal. Then the bad guy isn’t “our” government, it’s corporations everyone already hates. And it references problems people already experience.

It’s much easier to explain how the situation is already bad than it is to argue how it “could become” bad.

What if it bounced through multiple peers between sender and recipient, encrypted on each hop like Tor? Then they’d need to actually break the encryption, or compromise every hop.

Before Nixon, you could just save money for retirement.

It is designed. Being forced to buy real estate or stonks to save for retirement is a relatively recent policy, created by Richard Nixon, around the same time as deunionization that was also on purpose.

This is a false flag study to undermine public support for mathematics research!

I don’t usually block people but you’re just wasting everyone’s time on stupid nonsense.

Well the second half is true.

The validation is cheap, every node does that constantly. Do you mean proof-of-work mining?

If it’s p2p, then there are no insiders.