Yes please

(⁠✷⁠‿⁠✷⁠)

https://youtu.be/Czcbnc6YmLw

One of these Computers seems to defy gravity 👀

I just quit cold turkey and moved to lemmy fulltime. I miss some communities but whatev, its no biggie.

Wth kinda incel pedo shit is this i dont even

I’m sceptical. With all the added complexity of a foldable, the specs are probably gonna be below average to absymal. I’d love to be proven wrong tho.

Rough is my understatement. My $200 gamble on embracer stock is now worth about $40 lol

13

How many times do we have to go over this? Just don’t fuck with my hardware post-purchase with sketchy updates.

HL2 Ep 2 vibes… I dig it

What monopoly? M$ revenue + Nintendo revenue = Sony Gaming revenue

If anything, playing field just got level, as M$ post merger will be about the same size Sony is.

Declawing cats is inhuman and rightfully banned as animal abuse in many countries. Its like amputating a humans fingers.

Activision waa such a piece of shit, I m actually very excited for this. They shitcanned Bobby too. It can only get better.

Check this out:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Schrems

Facebook (and the complicit Irish Data Protection Comission) thought so too, an were rekt.

The case invalidated 2 seperate “safe harbor” agreements between the EU and the USA, making ANY data transfer of EU customers private data to the USA illegal without explicit consent. It was literally pandemonium in the IT sector for a few months, everyone was running stuff in US clouds and panicking.

This is what makes the EU high court (ECJ/EuGh) special: noone can pressure them politically. They couldn’t care less what anyone but EU law says.

And that was “just” GDPR, now they have way more EU laws (DMA, DSA) they can throw at FAANG.

Under GDPR and DMA, there would be real consequences. Like “being broken up or cease to exist” magnitude of consequences. Why would they risk it for the 1% of users who actually care and set their privacy settings accordingly?

Google doesnt care about you or anyones personal data. They care about the amount they collect. If the most privacy-aware users wrestle back some data and have it deleted, so be it. Google couldnt care less. Users are like cattle to them, as long as the general “data harvest rate” looks okay they wont investigate the odd one out.

I d rather have 2 to 3 (for critical, mid, and test systems) ssh keys that are regularly rotated than 1 key per machine. I m not gonna balance 50 ssh keys; neither enter my password every time i jump hosts.

Matrix can kinda emulate this kind of “all messages in one app” experience with bridges but you introduce a single server who decrypts all your end to end encryption so you pretty much have to self host. Also the bridges arent perfect so your msgs will sometimes look weird or not support some features.

I used it too. I miss it, but i get why they removed it: it just kinda breaks the Signal user experience and trust model. This app lives and dies by the users trust their conversations will be private. By having an option to message someone in a completely unencrypted, easy to intercept mode like SMS it risks this trust for little gain (some power users like us liked it). By removing it, the app concentrates on what is expected from it and removes a big possibility for user error while fleshing out its marketing image even more. It makes perfect sense but its a tad annoying.