Ugh you’re probably right, it’s going to be our generation’s DMC DeLorean. The vehicle itself will age poorly, but slap it in a BTTF reboot in five years and it’ll fit right in

Probably low-hanging fruit here, but Cybertrucks

Tbh there’s lots of stuff in the Barbie movie that I would consider timeless, especially the feminist aspects of it. What parts of the movie do you think applies to the 2020s but doesn’t apply to, say, 1990 or 1960?

EDIT: I may have interpreted this comment too pessimisticly-- this question is about the future, not the past. Maybe, hopefully, societal views on gender will change in the future enough that the Barbie movie will become outdated

Just a guess, but my guess is that the full text reads “JewsAgainst(Something)”, but it got automatically shortened to what you see here

Maybe Cory Doctorow?

Porno for Pyros, is that you?

Have you heard of REITs? Rent-seeking capitalists have been working together for decades to speculate on housing. Wealthy people have billions and billions of dollars invested in the status quo, and they are quite interested in maintaining their position of power.

Cuno is a wholesome person who has a misaligned view of what “wholesome” is because of the environment he grew up in and I will die on this hill

It’s ok to call yourself an egg, but calling other people eggs is like saying “I know your gender identity better than you do”.

I’d say the only time it’s ok to call someone else an egg is if it’s past tense, if the person has transitioned, and if their transition is public knowledge.

Bingo! Money is a unit of measurement, but it’s the only unit of measurement that we can buy. We can buy a kilogram of potatoes or a meter of cloth, but it would be ridiculous to just buy a kilogram or just a meter. And yet, I can promise you $120 Monday if you give me $100 today, which means I can buy a dollar.

There’s nothing inherently wrong with money, and any pre-scarcity economic system will need some kind of token or allowance to prevent overconsumption of resources :)

The lie that capitalism tells us is that the only reason anyone should ever want to use their money is to better themselves :)

Yeah I’m big in to STAB bonuses!

Simply Tap A, Brother

Better translation:

Frame 1: “So this is the Pal region! A new adventure awaits us!”

Frame 2: “Oh, she’s holding a ball and looking over here…are we going to have a battle right away?”

Frame 3: “What?”

Frame 4: “!?”

Frame 5: RATATATATATATATATAT

I’m having so much fun in Palworld, I really hope it makes Gamefreak wake the fuck up

Then for you, it’s not just about security and privacy, I guess

That’s not the only way ads are shown to you, though. For example, some youtube content creators like Internet Comment Etiquette will include ads from their major sponsors as part of the video itself. When that happens, you trust the security and privacy of the website enough to serve you content during the non-advertising parts of it, so what changes now that the content is an ad?

As a thought experiment, imagine if you were able to ascertain with 100% accuracy that an ad was not a security or privacy violation. Would you whitelist that ad server? For example, if viewing ads on your PC had as little potential for harm as viewing ads in the newspaper did, would you still block them?

Why isn’t it?

For me, that one takes a close second to I WANNA KNOW YOUR NAME (WANNA) WANNA KNOW EVERYTHING ABOUT YOU GIRL (WANNA KNOW YOUR NAME)

Oh, good to know! I’ll edit the OP

Liam Neeson jumps over a fence