

They can write whatever they like, but in practical terms, they can only enforce their laws inside their borders.
They can write whatever they like, but in practical terms, they can only enforce their laws inside their borders.
No European law applies outside Europe. That’s kind of the nature of laws.
How is Lord of the rings not on this list?
A run of market sales would drive down the price.
And if you can’t afford to rent, then got being able to buy is not a significant difference.
And what, leave the apartments empty? Have them earn zero money, rather than some money?
Because the English language is known for its rigid consistency of pluralization.
The government should be obligated to shield them from the causes of climate change. But I suppose that ship had sailed.
I think this is going to backfire as it increases competition for attention and audience
Same thing with streaming. There was a golden age, briefly, before everyone decided to make their own.
Indeed it is so.
Nevertheless, assholes.
If the employers are using computers to read my resume, why shouldn’t I used a computer to write it?
Assholes to the lot of them.
Because we don’t want them doing surge pricing.
Disagree. The DM should provide some sort of reason for the party to come together. Some sort of external influence, to bring in any characters that don’t start the game together.
But it is the duty of the player to roll with it. Don’t fight the plot hook. What’s the point?
Is there some reason we want brands to join the conversation?
More or less. No bonus points for me, I guess.
You need some kind of cue to keep in step. If you can see the other guys feet, that helps, but often tinted you can’t. The sound of yourself matching helps, but without some occasional cadence, or other governing factor, the speed of the match tends to change in a collective sort of way. My BMT platoon would get faster as we marched, unless the DI shouted at us occasionally.
Realistically, by way of being the political equivalent of a fleet-in-being.
Mostly, though, by way of ducking up anyone who looks like challenging our putative superiority.
I’ll make an exception for uploaders.
That’s because they banned the accounts.
Anyone who has an account on pornhub deserves their ban.
If you were to use their network to take advantage of the features for anything that the “predator” behind doesn’t care, you’re fine.
But what will the predator care about tomorrow? Or next year? And how confident are you that aggregate data is not what they want, for whatever reason?
Sure they can write laws making it illegal to claim the king of Thailand is a doddering old fool anywhere in the world. Good for them.
They have no legal right to enforce it on me, though. If I visit their country, of course, I will be subject to their laws. But they can’t apply it to me until then.