RollingZeppelin

It’s called precordial catch syndrome.
https://piefed.ca/post/649770

Damn, this one cuts to the core.

Yes, understood, ideally you would have two tests, one with high sensitivity to give some confidence that the disease is there, following by the high specificity test to compound the probability and rule out the false positive. Usually most tests have a trade off between specificity and sensitivity so two tests are needed.

Edit:
Watched the two videos, I love both these YouTubers but haven’t seen either video before. The calculating of the Bayes factor as an update to the prior odds was very interesting, helped increase my understanding, thank you.

This is why we use specificity and sensitivity stats for medical tests. If the test has a sensitivity of 97%, you should definitely be worried.

Pre-facebook Zuckerberg. Also post-facebook Zuckerberg.

Don’t forget to ideate solutions so we can down select for optimal performance.

What is going on with her left arm in OPs picture though??

I want to see the epic battle between this guy and the EDM mud wizard.

I think “direct democracy” might be a more palatable alternative.

You’re stittin on a gold mine Trebek!

Goddammit now I want pizza!