• 0 Posts
  • 9 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 25th, 2024

help-circle
  • Maetani@jlai.lutomemes@lemmy.worldThe Secret of Universe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    But that is my exact point, the only thing op is saying is that hate speech (along other edge cases) is protected by free speech. Which is true and doesn’t mean op agrees with it.

    It could be interpreted as “you can’t touch me, I am protected by free speech”, or “remember that some seemingly innocent laws also protect some very douchy behaviors”. Which one YOU decide to interpret it is on you.

    Either way, there is an interesting conversation to be had around the law, who is it there to protect, why, and what the limits should be. But instead that comment decided to say that “it doesn’t force the rest to agree with you” and claim that it makes op a racist. Just an irrelevant “feel good” argument and an ad hominem attack to shut down a conversation on a more than ever important subject.


  • Maetani@jlai.lutomemes@lemmy.worldThe Secret of Universe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    What you interpret as me changing sides is just me agreeing with the relevant arguments you make.

    You are the only one assuming my thoughts here. All I am saying since the beginning is that your argument doesn’t contradict op’s meme. It is not a false statement, I never said as such, it simply doesn’t contradict it, and using it to imply that op is racist is the issue at hand.

    Freedom of speech does protect hate speech, that’s an issue with it, and it merits to be discussed. Every right comes with drawbacks, and closing the discution in favor of circlejerking is never a good idea.

    On that note I’m getting tired of this discussion too, so I’ll stop there. Once again, I do not have a grudge against you or your ideas, I just hate seeing falacious arguments beeing aplauded all the time, but I guess that’s unavoidable on social medias, no matter which. Have a nice day, and ty for this conversation.


  • Maetani@jlai.lutomemes@lemmy.worldThe Secret of Universe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I have not backtracked on anything… My very first comment explicitly says that “It protects you against SOME consequences (then I proceed to list some as an example)”, which obviously implies that some others aren’t protected by it… I also never mentionned who would be enforcing it…

    I didn’t care which consequences you thought about, and still don’t. It’s not what my comments are about. My issue with your comment is you saying that freedom of speech doesn’t protect hate speech because it doesn’t give you freedom from ALL consequences. But freedom of speech gives the same protection to hate speech as any other form of speech.

    I would have the same to say if that comment was : " -Freedom of speech includes talking about minorities oppression -Freedom of speech doesn’t mean freedom of consequences you woke bastard " Or any other topic.

    I think I would agree with you on a lot of ideas, but using fallacious arguments is never helpfull.


  • Maetani@jlai.lutomemes@lemmy.worldThe Secret of Universe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    In a way… I admit that ALL types of free speech when used can have SOME consequences.

    The issue I have with your original statement is that you put all consequences in the same basket… With that logic you can say that freedom to vote does not mean freedom from consequences, therefore you can’t complain that I try to indimidate anyone if front of the booth



  • Maetani@jlai.lutomemes@lemmy.worldThe Secret of Universe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Except you are free from some consequences, that’s exactly why there are laws in place, to delimit what you can do without retaliation, and what you cannot.

    The freedom of speech includes retaliayion from the government, but is not limited to it.

    These other laws you mention are there to limit the scope of freedom of speech, because it would otherwise explicitly allow it…