Hello_there

I’m more upset by the word ‘Resto’ in the title

Why is a YouTube video being posted in an ask thread? You have already provided an answer to your question in the form of a video. This isn’t answerlemmy, and it isn’t you providing any of your personal thoughts in the context of the question.

Please don’t color part of a word blue and part of a word black

Like, could you imagine this article ending on a ‘dont touch this dumpster fire of a stock’ line? Conde nast would not allow that.
The article was so glowing at the end it almost swayed me until that realization

Look up the piece by pbs and by John Oliver. They also do a cocoa bean tracking system so they know where the beans are coming from. This is importa t to know that the beans are coming from the good farms and not from the bad ones. All that being said, they say they can’t say slavery free due to how bad it is in that area. They can’t guarantee that.
I think for me it’s as simple as - do I go with the brand that seems to be doing something about it? Or go with the brand that misses it’s own targets and is satisfied with the horrible status quo

That’s a purposeful choice to show that not everyone gets an equal piece. Some start out with a giant piece and others get just a tiny one.

One of the few brands actually taking concrete steps about child slavery on cocoa farms. They have had pieces on them done by pbs and I think 60 mins.

Vote for your class. Ignore the ideology.

Sweden by C418

Looks like someone never tried to use Skype UI back in the day. It was different from, and substantially worse than, all the other messaging and voice programs out there.

600k for causing a mass migration. Fuck that and fuck CEO compensation in general

Almost nobody designs new houses from scratch. Seems a lil like setting yourself up for failure

No. What kind of crazy shit is this?
Income tax is one of the only tools that could be used to combat inequality

I think you’re placing too much value on the label in this discussion.
E.g., you could make houses out of redwood beams back in the day. It was great - insect resistant, fire resistant. Lasts a long time. Problem is that these trees take much too long to grow, and there’s no way they’re coming back any time soon. You’re mining a nonrenewable resource and you’re going to run out (and also kill an ecosystem). That’s an unsustainable business practice.
Also, people are much more disposable oriented than you seem to be considering. Japanese houses last for like 20 years before they’re considered in need of replacement. I’ve seen a brand new house in the US, 3 years old, be razed and rebuilt because the rich owner wanted the building made his way, and not the way the former owner built it.

Traditional capitalism back in the day was sweatshops and traveling snake oil salesmen.
In modern times, that’s sweatshops in India and drug ads on TV with 'tiny text of ‘This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.’
For sustainability - we clearcut forests and filled coastlines without restraint - that’s not sustainable and we had to stop because there aren’t as much left.
I don’t think the last is necessarily the source of goodness that you seem to think it is.

I’ve played a night so far and prob got my $26 of value in the next few days.
It’s fun and think I can spend some time on it. What else is there to ask?
Also, you know there’s going to be mods to add licensed chars to the game so that should add another level of fun when you can ride Thomas the train to run over legally distinct pikachus

Because the ‘founders’ made the Senate and house to be anti urban

Isn’t this the longest lad game ever? If it’s something only the doe hards are actually going to get to, I could see locking it behind more $

I can take the entirety of Harry Potter, run it thru chat gpt to ‘rewrite in the style of Lord of the rings’, and rename the characters. Assuming it all works correctly, everything should be reworded. But, I would get deservedly sued into the ground.
News articles might be a different subject matter, but a blatant rewording of each sentence, line by line, still seems like a valid copyright claim.
You have to add context or nuance or use multiple sources. Some kind of original thought. You can’t just wholly repackage someone else’s work and profit off of that.

I doubt they did the ‘rewrote this text like this’ prompt you state. This would just come out in any trial if it was that simple and would be a giant black mark on the paper for filing a frivolous lawsuit.

If we rule that out, then it means that gpt had article text in its knowledge base, and nyt was able to get it to copy that text out in its response.
Even that is problematic. Either gpt does this a lot and usually rewrites it better, or it does that sometimes. Both are copyright offenses.

Nyt has copyright over its article text, and they didn’t give license to gpt to reproduce it. Even if they had to coax the text out thru lots of prompts and creative trial and error, it still stands that gpt copied text and reproduced it and made money off that act without the agreement of the rights holder.