so you’re using “neoimperialism” to refer to what Lenin called imperialism?
unpaid intern admin at Lemmygrad Inc.™
unlimited death to 🇺🇸 and its proxies
so you’re using “neoimperialism” to refer to what Lenin called imperialism?
“standard” as in the type practiced by the US, France and a few others (roughly, control through both finance capital and hands-on repression of resistance)?
of course; I’m just wondering whether it makes sense to call countries imperialist if they don’t engage in imperialism independently (in which case more or less all of Europe would be imperialist)
if country A participates in country B’s imperialist project (e.g. joining an invasion), wouldn’t that make country A an imperialist power (albeit a lesser one) as well?
Isn’t this just the ML definition of modern imperialism? Is there a country that’s imperialist in the classical (pre-capitalist) sense?
which lecture is that?
archive.is and similar sites aren’t great for Tor users (at best, you have to solve a CAPTCHA), so providing an alternate archive.org link would also be appreciated
brutalized the Polish population
this is an interesting way of saying “prevented the genocide of Polish Jews in the occupied region”
they definitely don’t; it’s just an excuse for settler colonialism, as shown by what they’ve done to Jews in the Global South
if you haven’t already, I would recommend reading Blum’s “Killing Hope”
there are actually a few million replacement pawns just out of shot, for realism
and now it’s an apartheid state :|
I see; I’ve never seen “neoimperialism” used as a synonym for neocolonialism elsewhere