• 1 Post
  • 234 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 19th, 2025

help-circle

  • Yes but not in a way she would think another person may view it, most likely. Obviously IANAL but surely intent matters here?

    If people actively realised someone can read all their chats, I’m sure these services would be far less popular.

    And here’s the autism slop because I can’t think of the proper term for “actively realising” and do not have the energy to make it readable anymore:
    What I mean is, I’m sure plenty of people know in the back of their mind that their data is not protected there, but it’s not the first, or second, or probably even tenth thing they think about when starting a chat.



  • What stood out to me more was just the design of the website. A human could have made it of course, but there’s a lot of little design things you pretty much always see in LLM-generated websites.

    I did do some more searching before I posted that comment though. What I found way more damning, is what you see when clicking through to the parent company or something (they’re not actually companies afaict, not sure what they are instead).

    The website of this Lazarus Library also heavily smells like AI slop to me. Searching the parent company listed on that website leads to a trademark for “PhotoOpAI”. These are parts of their statements found here:

    Downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence (AI) for providing information (…) based upon a photo of the item or object

    Providing on-line non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence (AI) for use in taking photos of items and objects and providing information

    So they’re definitely deep in the AI hole.