Why yes, yes we are.

Thank you for proving my point. Sexuality is not a decision, and that doesn’t stop at what gender(s) you’re attracted to.

Lol, you get to decide what is nature, and what is decision? That’s some impressive responsibility you were given, friend-o. Did your deity of choice sign your license to judge on the origins of sexual nature themselves, or did they have their secretarial demigod sign for them?

You aren’t born straight/gay, you wucking feirdo! You make that decision on your own.

Because Merriam Webster creates and produces the dictionary of the English language. They’re literally the one who decides if a word is official. Their retort is succinct.

Ha! I saw this and thought “It’s clearly white and gold, let’s check out the comments” then I read a comment saying it was objectively blue and black, so I scrolled up to take another look, and now I can no longer see the white and gold no matter how hard I try.

Why aren’t they tokens when you use them? Does your brain not also choose the most apt selection for the sequence to make maximal meaning in the context prompted? I assert that after a sufficiently complex obfuscation of the underlying mathematical calculations the concept of reasoning becomes an exercise in pedantic dissection of the mutual interpretation of meaning. Our own minds are objectively deterministic, but the obfuscation provided by lack of direct observation provides the quantum cover fire needed to claim we are not just LLM equivalent representation on biological circuit boards.

That’s really it? Are you maybe missing some links?

For the good of all of us

That’s cool, but they’re NOT the space robots. They are NOT here to protect us. They will not protect us from the terrible secret of space.

Not if you’re going to play Dwarf Fortress!