I do /volumX for additional hard drives.
For most network share I use /mnt/$server.
I do /volumX for additional hard drives.
For most network share I use /mnt/$server.
Love it!!
Is a problem that LFC is used? As it only duplicate frames.
When the framerate drops below the minimum refresh rate of the display, frames are duplicated and displayed multiple times so that they can sync to a refresh rate that is within the displays refresh rate range. For example, a display with a 60 – 144Hz refresh rate, would be able to sync the frames of a game running at 40 FPS, by doubling them so that the display could sync and run at 80 Hz. A display with LFC effectively results in the removal of the minimum refresh rate boundary.
https://www.amd.com/en/products/graphics/technologies/freesync.html
Test out Play Sync for Lemmy works great.
I love masonry view. This is the first web app I have see, that is closers to Sync for Lemmy.
Thank you.
I think a exception can be made for industrial service (infrastructure, bankterminals) run on a dedicated MPLS network. With low bandwidth <1Mbit/s but higher level of reliability (low packaging drop).
On a per app level is definition of no net neutrality.
Is this not similar to the Android Java interface?
HDMI 2.1cspecs are closed source.
Yes there is TPM for full disk encryption.
https://gist.github.com/orhun/02102b3af3acfdaf9a5a2164bea7c3d6#using-tpm-20
Do I had problem making swap partition work. As lockdown mode is triggered.
https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/kernel_lockdown.7.html
I current only encrypted home.
Vaultwarden is a lightweight server of bitwarden.
Alternative implementation of the Bitwarden server API written in Rust and compatible with upstream Bitwarden clients*, perfect for self-hosted deployment where running the official resource-heavy service might not be ideal.
Server side is more complex. So for serverside you will be hard to find non docker og non manual installasion.
Bitwarden have deb and rpm support.
BTRFS is currently not Journaling
Qu Wenruo did a write up on some of the edge cases. Partial write being one of them.
I run BTRFS my self.
And I agree BTRFS , is superior.
Yes both BTRFS and Ext4 are vulnerable to unplanned powerloss when writes are in flight. Commonly knows as a write hole.
For BTRFS since it use of Copy of Write, it is more vulnerable. As metadata needs to be updated and more. Ext4 does not have CoW.
This will also happen to Ext4. You just wouldn’t know it.
I used to feel opening a Quora page was okay, and useful.
No i dread opening a Quora page. You get spammed by “do you like to login with Google”. There is a AI bot on top, befor the top replay. There is a AD/sponsor spot that looks like the rest of the page, you get Related questions, then you get other answers. So now you need to think to open the page.
If it tested the resistance i would be great.
Why not allow India to block Wikipedia? Or have a filter that hides Indians dark secrets, when coming from India.