Balios

Neither do they have copyright of the stock art they used to purchase. The complete piece, however, including pip boy, is not AI generated. Someone put this together, put effort into it, which easily qualifies it for copyright protection, even if the background is AI generated instead of bought stock art.

Just say directly that you won’t buy it

Don’t worry, it actually puts the lives of a few select people over everything and everyone else, under the disguise of “tHe eCoNOmY”.

My bubble disappointingly is still doing that on Twitter. Since they convinced themselves that Twitter is an essential networking tool it’s hard to ditch.
LinkedIn was more seen as “if you want to leave science go to LinkedIn, otherwise ignore that platform”. But it absolutely does happen there, too, just not to that extend, from what I am seeing.

When I was still using it for science we simply boasted about our achievements and called that “networking”.
My new paper is out in the International Journal of Unreproducible Science, cite me, I’m begging you!