I agree that its weird to use a content license.
But in what way do your listed requirements not apply to this project and license?
You can do whatever you want, besides makind money with it or sharing/changing it without attribution.
As far as i know hardware licenses are a bit strange still?
But i just dont unterstand your point and would like to





Ah, ok. I would argue its advertised as os not fos (leaving the s as its not Software) and open source meanse the source is open, not that its permissive to do whatever you want with it